Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta associated with improved survival in hemorrhagic shock
- PMID: 35324991
- PMCID: PMC8947416
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265778
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta associated with improved survival in hemorrhagic shock
Abstract
Background: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is controversial as a hemorrhage control adjunct due to lack of data with a suitable control group. We aimed to determine outcomes of trauma patients in shock undergoing REBOA versus no-REBOA.
Methods: This single-center, retrospective, matched cohort study analyzed patients ≥16 years in hemorrhagic shock without cardiac arrest (2000-2019). REBOA (R; 2015-2019) patients were propensity matched 2:1 to historic (H; 2000-2012) and contemporary (C; 2013-2019) groups. In-hospital mortality and 30-day survival were analyzed using chi-squared and log rank testing, respectively.
Results: A total of 102,481 patients were included (R = 57, C = 88,545, H = 13,879). Propensity scores were assigned using age, race, mechanism, lowest systolic blood pressure, lowest Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and body region Abbreviated Injury Scale scores to generate matched groups (R = 57, C = 114, H = 114). In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the REBOA group (19.3%) compared to the contemporary (35.1%; p = 0.024) and historic (44.7%; p = 0.001) groups. 30-day survival was significantly higher in the REBOA versus no-REBOA groups.
Conclusion: In a high-volume center where its use is part of a coordinated hemorrhage control strategy, REBOA is associated with improved survival in patients with noncompressible torso hemorrhage.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Jonathan J Morrison is on the Medical Advisory Board of Prytime Medical. The remainder of the authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Figures
References
-
- Matsuoka S, Uchiyama K, Shima H, Ohishi S, Nojiri Y, Ogata H. Temporary percutaneous aortic balloon occlusion to enhance fluid resuscitation prior to definitive embolization of posttraumatic liver hemorrhage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001. Aug;24(4):274–6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0003-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Brenner ML, Moore LLJ, DuBose JJJ, Tyson GGH, McNutt MMK, Albardo R, et al.. A clinical series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control and resuscitation. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013;75(3):506–11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829e5416 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Norii T, Miyata S, Terasaka Y, Guliani S, Lu SW, Crandall C, et al.. Survival of severe blunt trauma patients treated with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta compared with propensity score/adjusted untreated patients. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2015;78(4):721–8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000578 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yamamoto R, Cestero RF, Suzuki M, Funabiki T, Sasaki J. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is associated with improved survival in severely injured patients: A propensity score matching analysis. American journal of surgery. 2019;(xxxx). doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.007 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources