Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Mar 1;51(3):afac049.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac049.

BABEL (Better tArgeting, Better outcomes for frail ELderly patients) advance care planning: a comprehensive approach to advance care planning in nursing homes: a cluster randomised trial

Allan Garland  1 , Heather Keller  2 , Patrick Quail  3 , Veronique Boscart  4 , Michelle Heyer  4 , Clare Ramsey  1 , Vanessa Vucea  2 , Nora Choi  1 , Ikdip Bains  2 , Seema King  3 , Tatiana Oshchepkova  3 , Tatiana Kalashnikova  3 , Brittany Kroetsch  2 , Jessica Steer  1 , George Heckman  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

BABEL (Better tArgeting, Better outcomes for frail ELderly patients) advance care planning: a comprehensive approach to advance care planning in nursing homes: a cluster randomised trial

Allan Garland et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Background: Nursing home (NH) residents should have the opportunity to consider, discuss and document their healthcare wishes. However, such advance care planning (ACP) is frequently suboptimal.

Objective: Assess a comprehensive, person-centred ACP approach.

Design: Unblinded, cluster randomised trial.

Setting: Fourteen control and 15 intervention NHs in three Canadian provinces, 2018-2020.

Subjects: 713 residents (442 control, 271 intervention) aged ≥65 years, with elevated mortality risk.

Methods: The intervention was a structured, $\sim$60-min discussion between a resident, substitute decision-maker (SDM) and nursing home staff to: (i) confirm SDMs' identities and role; (ii) prepare SDMs for medical emergencies; (iii) explain residents' clinical condition and prognosis; (iv) ascertain residents' preferred philosophy to guide decision-making and (v) identify residents' preferred options for specific medical emergencies. Control NHs continued their usual ACP processes. Co-primary outcomes were: (a) comprehensiveness of advance care planning, assessed using the Audit of Advance Care Planning, and (b) Comfort Assessment in Dying. Ten secondary outcomes were assessed. P-values were adjusted for all 12 outcomes using the false discovery rate method.

Results: The intervention resulted in 5.21-fold higher odds of respondents rating ACP comprehensiveness as being better (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.53, 7.61). Comfort in dying did not differ (difference = -0.61; 95% CI -2.2, 1.0). Among the secondary outcomes, antimicrobial use was significantly lower in intervention homes (rate ratio = 0.79, 95% CI 0.66, 0.94).

Conclusions: Superior comprehensiveness of the BABEL approach to ACP underscores the importance of allowing adequate time to address all important aspects of ACP and may reduce unwanted interventions towards the end of life.

Keywords: Advance care planning; cluster randomised studies; nursing homes; older people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram for the BABEL ACP study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Marginal, adjusted values of the resident audit of ACP (co-primary outcome), by group; from the model in Supplementary Table 4.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Care of Older People UK Market Report. London: LaingBuisson; 2016; 27th.https://www.laingbuisson.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Care_OlderPeople.... (cited 24 September 2021).
    1. Hirdes JP, Mitchell L, Maxwell CJ, White N. Beyond the `Iron Lungs of Gerontology': Using Evidence to Shape the Future of Nursing Homes in Canada. Can J Aging 2011; 30: 371–90. - PubMed
    1. Katz P. An international perspective on long term care: focus on nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011; 12: 487–492.e1. - PubMed
    1. Nursing Home Care . Centers for Disease Control; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/nursing-home-care.htm. (cited 7 September 2020).
    1. Kojima G. Prevalence of frailty in nursing homes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16: 940–5. - PubMed

Publication types