Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug;43(6):1193-1204.
doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02880-6. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Patient and Device Selection in Pediatric MCS: A Review of Current Consensus and Unsettled Questions

Affiliations
Review

Patient and Device Selection in Pediatric MCS: A Review of Current Consensus and Unsettled Questions

Joshua M Friedland-Little et al. Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

The field of pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) support has expanded significantly over the past 20 years, with one third of pediatric heart transplant recipients currently being bridged to transplant with a VAD. Despite increased pediatric VAD utilization, however, there remains little formalized guidance for patient or device selection. The population of children with advanced heart failure is quite heterogeneous, and the available data suggest that VAD outcomes vary significantly based upon patient size, anatomy, level of illness, and type of device implanted. In an effort to better understand current practice patterns and identify populations for whom there does not appear to be a consensus approach to achieving optimal VAD outcomes, the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) has surveyed clinical decision-making among member sites and conducted a review of the available literature regarding patient population-specific VAD outcomes and center-specific practices related to patient and device selection. Rather than aiming to provide clinical guidelines, this document offers an overview of contemporary approaches to patient and device selection, highlighting specific populations for whom there is not a consensus approach to achieving reliably good VAD outcomes, as these populations may benefit most from future research and quality improvement efforts directed toward identifying best practice.

Keywords: Heart failure; Mechanical circulatory support; Pediatric; Ventricular assist device.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rossano JW et al (2019) The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-second pediatric heart transplantation report - 2019; Focus theme: Donor and recipient size match. J Heart Lung Transplant 38(10):1028–1041 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Zafar F et al (2015) Pediatric heart transplant waiting list mortality in the era of ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 34(1):82–88 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Auerbach SR, Simpson KE, I. Action Learning Network (2021) HVAD usage and outcomes in the current pediatric ventricular assist device field: an advanced cardiac therapies improving outcomes network analysis. ASAIO J 67:675–680 - PubMed - DOI
    1. O’Connor MJ et al (2020) Early experience with the HeartMate 3 continuous-flow ventricular assist device in pediatric patients and patients with congenital heart disease: a multicenter registry analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant 39(6):573–579 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Zafar F et al (2021) Berlin Heart EXCOR and ACTION post-approval surveillance study report. J Heart Lung Transplant 40(4):251–259 - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources