Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022:2408:37-69.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1875-2_3.

Genome Editing and Designer Crops for the Future

Affiliations

Genome Editing and Designer Crops for the Future

Sumi Rana et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2022.

Abstract

Domestication spanning over thousands of years led to the evolution of crops that are being cultivated in recent times. Later, selective breeding methods were practiced by human to produce improved cultivars/germplasm. Classical breeding was further transformed into molecular- and genomics-assisted breeding strategies, however, these approaches are labor-intensive and time-consuming. The advent of omics technologies has facilitated the identification of genes and genetic determinants that regulate particular traits allowing the direct manipulation of target genes and genomic regions to achieve desirable phenotype. Recently, genome editing technologies such as meganucleases (MN), zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/CRISPR-Associated protein 9 (Cas9) have gained popularity for precise editing of genes to develop crop varieties with superior agronomic, physiological, climate-resilient, and nutritional traits. Owing to the efficiency and precision, genome editing approaches have been widely used to design the crops that can survive the challenges posed by changing climate, and also cater the food and nutritional requirements for ever-growing population. Here, we briefly review different genome editing technologies deployed for crop improvement, and the fundamental differences between GE technology and transgene-based approach. We also summarize the recent advances in genome editing and how this radical expansion can complement the previously established technologies along with breeding for creating designer crops.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; Crop improvement; Genome editing; Meganucleases; Synthetic biology; Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs); Zinc-finger nucleases.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abdelrahman M, Sawada Y, Nakabayashi R, Sato S, Hirakawa H, El-Sayed M, Hirai MY, Saito K, Yamauchi N, Shigyo M (2015) Integrating transcriptome and target metabolome variability in doubled haploids of Allium cepa for abiotic stress protection. Mol Breed 35:195
    1. Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang DL, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y et al (2013) Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 23:1229–1232 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Que Q, Chilton M, de Fontes C, He C, Nuccio M, Hu Z et al (2010) Trait stacking in transgenic plants—challenges and opportunities. GM Crops 1:220–229 - PubMed
    1. Puchta H (2005) The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J Exp Bot 56:1–14 - PubMed
    1. Puchta H, Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. Plant J 78(5):727–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12338 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources