The robotic learning curve for a newly appointed colorectal surgeon
- PMID: 35325433
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01400-1
The robotic learning curve for a newly appointed colorectal surgeon
Abstract
Robotic colorectal surgery allows for better ergonomics, superior retraction, and fine movements in the narrow anatomy of the pelvis. Recent years have seen the uptake of robotic surgery in all pelvic surgeries specifically in low rectal malignancies. However, the learning curve of robotic surgery in this cohort is unclear as established training pathways are not formalized. This study looks at the experience and learning curve of a single laparoscopic trained surgeon in performing safe and effective resections, mainly for low rectal and anal malignancies using the da Vinci robotic system by evaluating metrics related to surgical process and patient outcome. A serial retrospective review of the robotic colorectal surgery database, in the University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire (UHCW), was undertaken. All 48 consecutive cases, performed by a recently qualified colorectal surgeon, were included in our study. The surgical process was evaluated using both console and total operative time recorded in each case along with the adequacy of resections performed; in addition, patient-related outcomes including intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed to assess differences in the learning curve. Forty eight sequential recto-sigmoid resections were included in the study performed by a single surgeon. The cases were divided into four cohorts in chronological order with comparable demographics, tumour stage, location, and complexity of the operation (mean age 65, male 79%, and female 29%). The results showed that the mean console time dropped from 3 to 2.5 h, while total operative time dropped from 6 h to 5.5 h as the surgeon became more experienced; however, this was not found to be statistically significant. In addition, no significant difference in pathological staging was seen over the study period. No major intra-op and post-op complications were observed and no 30-day mortality was recorded. Moreover, after 30 cases, the learning curve developed the plateau phase, suggesting the gain of maximum proficiency of skills required for robotic colorectal resections. The learning curve in robotic rectal surgery is short and flattens early; complication rates are low during the learning curve and continue to decrease with time. This shows that with proper training and proctoring, new colorectal surgeons can be trained in a short time to perform elective colorectal pelvic resections.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Da Vinci; Learning curve; Robotic surgery.
© 2022. Crown.
Similar articles
-
Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4067-4076. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5453-9. Epub 2017 Mar 7. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 28271267
-
Learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery.J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):489-495. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01131-1. Epub 2020 Aug 4. J Robot Surg. 2021. PMID: 32754791
-
Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):558-68. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3698-0. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25030474
-
Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible?J Robot Surg. 2016 Dec;10(4):289-296. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0616-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22. J Robot Surg. 2016. PMID: 27334771 Review.
-
Appraisal and Current Considerations of Robotics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):152-158. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0571. Epub 2018 Oct 16. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019. PMID: 30325690 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of robotic platform to perform R0 resection for locally advanced multi-visceral pelvic malignancy: an institutional experience on outcomes of robotic pelvic exenteration.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Dec 16;409(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03206-7. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 38102305
-
The role of Da Vinci Xi robotic simulation curriculum in enhancing skills in robotic colorectal surgery.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 20;85(12):6001-6007. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001342. eCollection 2023 Dec. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023. PMID: 38098541 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Learning Curve on Lymph Nodes Retrieval and Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay in Robotic Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective, Observational Study.Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;8(5):e70759. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70759. eCollection 2025 May. Health Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40309630 Free PMC article.
-
Learning curve of robotic colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical proficiency, outcomes, and training protocols.J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 25;19(1):509. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02648-z. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40853513 Review.
-
Robotic platforms in gynaecological surgery: past, present, and future.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Jun;16(2):163-172. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.2.024. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024. PMID: 38950530 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous