Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;77(5):588-597.
doi: 10.1111/anae.15717. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Prevention and management of intra-operative pain during caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia: a technical and interpersonal approach

F Plaat  1 , S E R Stanford  2 , D N Lucas  3 , J Andrade  4 , J Careless  5 , R Russell  6 , D Bishop  7 , Q Lo  8 , D Bogod  9
Affiliations

Prevention and management of intra-operative pain during caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia: a technical and interpersonal approach

F Plaat et al. Anaesthesia. 2022 May.

Abstract

A woman who experiences pain during caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia is at risk of adverse psychological sequelae. Litigation arising from pain during caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia has replaced accidental awareness under general anaesthesia as the most common successful medicolegal claim against obstetric anaesthetists. Generic guidelines on caesarean section exist, but they do not provide specific recommendations for this area of anaesthetic practice. This guidance aims to offer pragmatic advice to support anaesthetists in caring for women during caesarean section. It emphasises the importance of non-technical skills, offers advice on best practice and aims to encourage standardisation. The guidance results from a collaborative effort by anaesthetists, psychologists and patients and has been developed to support clinicians and promote standardisation of practice in this area.

Keywords: caesarean section; epidural; pain; spinal; testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bamber JH, Lucas DN, Plaat F, Russell R. Obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK: a descriptive analysis of the National Obstetric Anaesthetic Database 2009–14. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2020; 125: 580–7. - PubMed
    1. Szypula K, Ashpole KJ, Bogod D, et al. Litigation related to regional anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995‐2007. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 443–52. - PubMed
    1. McCombe K, Bogod DG. Learning from the law. A review of 21 years of litigation for pain during caesarean section. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 223–30. - PubMed
    1. Yentis SM. Height of confusion: assessing regional blocks before caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2006; 15: 2–6. - PubMed
    1. Patel R, Kua J, Sharawi N et al. Inadequate neuraxial anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective caesarean section: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 2022. Epub 22 January. 10.1111/anae.15657 - DOI - PubMed