Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 25;11(3):456.
doi: 10.3390/antiox11030456.

The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Sl1 Is Critical for Cadmium Tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum L

Affiliations

The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Sl1 Is Critical for Cadmium Tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum L

Chen-Xu Liu et al. Antioxidants (Basel). .

Abstract

Heavy metal cadmium (Cd) at high concentrations severely disturbs plant growth and development. The E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in protein degradation is critical for plant tolerance to abiotic stress, but the role of E3 ubiquitin ligases in Cd tolerance is largely unknown in tomato. Here, we characterized an E3 ubiquitin ligase gene Sl1, which was highly expressed in roots under Cd stress in our previous study. The subcellular localization of Sl1 revealed that it was located in plasma membranes. In vitro ubiquitination assays confirmed that Sl1 had E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Knockout of the Sl1 gene by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology reduced while its overexpression increased Cd tolerance as reflected by the changes in the actual quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation. Cd-induced increased activities of antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR) were compromised in sl1 mutants but were enhanced in Sl1 overexpressing lines. Furthermore, the content of Cd in both shoots and roots increased in sl1 mutants while reduced in Sl1 overexpressing plants. Gene expression assays revealed that Sl1 regulated the transcript levels of heavy metal transport-related genes to inhibit Cd accumulation. These findings demonstrate that Sl1 plays a critical role in regulating Cd tolerance by relieving oxidative stress and resisting heavy metal transportation in tomato. The study provides a new understanding of the mechanism of plant tolerance to heavy metal stress.

Keywords: antioxidant enzymes; heavy metal stress; protein degradation; tomato; ubiquitination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The relative expression level of Sl1 in tomato plants. (A) The relative expression level of Sl1 in different tissues of tomato. (B) Time course of the relative expression level of Sl1 in tomato root with and without Cd stress. The data presented here are the average of three biological replicates (±SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Figure 2
Figure 2
E3 ligase activity and subcellular localization of Sl1. (A) In vitro expression of MBP-Sl1 and MBP-EV. T: total protein; S: soluble protein; B: before expression; A: after expression. (B) In vitro E3 ligase activity of Sl1 protein. The reaction system included E1, E2, MBP-Sl1, and ubiquitin-His, the replacement of MBP-Sl1 with MBP-EV and the absence of E1, E2, and His-Ub as control. The Western blot was detected with anti-MBP and anti-His. (C) Subcellular localization of GFP-Sl1 and GFP-EV. The GFP-Sl1 was transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana (tobacco with nucleus-located mCherry). Images were pictured by confocal microscope after 48 h infiltration. Bar = 25 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sl1 positively regulates tomato Cd tolerance. (A) The phenotype of Sl1 mutant lines (sl1-1/2), wild-type (WT), and Sl1 overexpressing lines (Sl1-OE-1/2) under control and Cd stress after 15 d treatment. Bar = 10 cm. (B) The content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the roots of Sl1 mutant lines (sl1-1/2), WT, and Sl1 overexpressing lines (Sl1-OE-1/2) under control and Cd stress after 3 d treatment. (C,D) the image and level of actual quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII) of sl1-1/2, WT, and Sl1-OE-1/2 plants with and without Cd treatment for 15 d. Bar = 1 cm. The data presented here are the average of three biological replicates (±SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sl1 promotes antioxidant enzyme activities in tomato plants under Cd stress. The activities of SOD, CAT, APX, and GR in the roots of Sl1 mutant lines (sl1-1/2), wild-type (WT), and Sl1 overexpressing lines (Sl1-OE-1/2) under Cd stress for 3 d. The data presented here are the average of three biological replicates (±SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sl1 decreases Cd content in tomato plants under Cd stress. The Cd content in the shoot (A) and root (B) of Sl1 mutant lines (sl1-1/2), wild-type (WT), and Sl1 overexpressing lines (Sl1-OE-1/2) under Cd stress for 10 d. (C) Cd accumulation in tomato root tips stained by the Cd-specific probe LeadmiumTM Green AM. Bar = 25 μm. (D) Relative fluorescence intensity of Cd staining over tomato root tips of sl1 mutants, wild-type, and Sl1 overexpressing lines after 10 d Cd treatment. The relative fluorescence intensity is normalized to the intensity of wild-type in (C). The data presented here are the average of three biological replicates (±SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Sl1 negatively regulates the transcripts of genes related to heavy metal transportation. The relative expression of CAX3, HMA-A, HMA-B, and IRT1 in the roots of Sl1 mutant lines (sl1-1/2), wild-type (WT), and Sl1 overexpressing lines (Sl1-OE-1/2) under Cd stress for 3 d. The data presented here are the average of three biological replicates (±SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haider F.U., Liqun C., Coulter J.A., Cheema S.A., Wu J., Zhang R., Wenjun M., Farooq M. Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021;211:111887. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111887. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clemens S., Ma J.F. Toxic heavy metal and metalloid accumulation in crop plants and foods. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016;67:489–512. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang G., Fukami M., Sekimoto H. Genotypic differences in effects of cadmium on growth and nutrient compositions in wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 2000;23:1337–1350. doi: 10.1080/01904160009382104. - DOI
    1. Clemens S., Aarts M.G.M., Thomine S., Verbruggen N. Plant science: The key to preventing slow cadmium poisoning. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rizwan M., Ali S., Adrees M., Ibrahim M., Tsang D.C.W., Zia-ur-Rehman M., Zahir Z.A., Rinklebe J., Tack F.M.G., Ok Y.S. A critical review on effects, tolerance mechanisms and management of cadmium in vegetables. Chemosphere. 2017;182:90–105. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.013. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources