Study: International Multicentric Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases (SIMMILR-CRLM)
- PMID: 35326532
- PMCID: PMC8946765
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061379
Study: International Multicentric Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases (SIMMILR-CRLM)
Abstract
(1) Background: Here we report on a retrospective study of an international multicentric cohort after minimally invasive liver resection (SIMMILR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) from six centers. (2) Methods: Resections were divided by the approach used: open liver resection (OLR), laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and robotic liver resection (RLR). Patients with macrovascular invasion, more than three metastases measuring more than 3 cm or a solitary metastasis more than 5 cm were excluded, and any remaining heterogeneity found was further analyzed after propensity score matching (PSM) to decrease any potential bias. (3) Results: Prior to matching, 566 patients underwent OLR, 462 LLR and 36 RLR for CRLM. After PSM, 142 patients were in each group of the OLR vs. LLR group and 22 in the OLR vs. RLR and 21 in the LLR vs. RLR groups. Blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity rates were all highly statistically significantly increased in the OLR compared to the LLR group, 636 mL vs. 353 mL, 9 vs. 5 days and 25% vs. 6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Only blood loss was significantly decreased when RLR was compared to OLR and LLR, 250 mL vs. 597 mL, and 224 mL vs. 778 mL, p < 0.008 and p < 0.04, respectively. (4) Conclusions: SIMMILR indicates that minimally invasive approaches for CRLM that follow the Milan criteria may have short term advantages. Notably, larger studies with long-term follow-up comparing robotic resections to both OLR and LLR are still needed.
Keywords: colorectal liver metastasis; hepatectomy; international; laparoscopic; laparoscopy; liver resection; minimally invasive; multicentric; robot-assisted; robotic.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Survival Study: International Multicentric Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases (SIMMILR-2).Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;14(17):4190. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174190. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36077728 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;131(2):262-273. doi: 10.1002/jso.27909. Epub 2024 Oct 10. J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39387561 Free PMC article.
-
Expanding indications for laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of posterosuperior liver segments in patients with colorectal metastases: comparison with open hepatectomy for immediate and long-term outcomes.Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):96-103. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07363-z. Epub 2020 Jan 13. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 31932927
-
Operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases located in the posterosuperior liver: a propensity score matching analysis.Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1776-1786. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5861-x. Epub 2017 Sep 15. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 28917012 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases-A Review.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 26;15(1):142. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010142. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36612137 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;10(12):2433. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122433. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36553957 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 12;15(4):1179. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041179. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36831521 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for liver malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):56-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10561-5. Epub 2023 Nov 28. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38017157
-
The preoperative M2BPGi score predicts operative difficulty and the incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic liver resection.Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1262-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09664-2. Epub 2022 Sep 29. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36175698
-
Wingless/It/β-catenin signaling in liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: A focus on biological mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.World J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 14;29(18):2764-2783. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2764. World J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37274070 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Gagner M., Rheault M., Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg. Endosc. 1992;6:99.
-
- Cherqui D. Benign liver tumors. J. Chir. 2001;138:19–26. - PubMed
-
- Gayet B., Cavaliere D., Castel B., Carlini F., Vibert E., Mal F. Laparoscopic liver surgery for metastases of colorectal cancer: Analysis of a monocentric experience. Suppl. Tumori. 2005;4:S135–S137. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous