Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1379.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14061379.

Study: International Multicentric Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases (SIMMILR-CRLM)

Affiliations

Study: International Multicentric Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases (SIMMILR-CRLM)

Andrew A Gumbs et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

(1) Background: Here we report on a retrospective study of an international multicentric cohort after minimally invasive liver resection (SIMMILR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) from six centers. (2) Methods: Resections were divided by the approach used: open liver resection (OLR), laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and robotic liver resection (RLR). Patients with macrovascular invasion, more than three metastases measuring more than 3 cm or a solitary metastasis more than 5 cm were excluded, and any remaining heterogeneity found was further analyzed after propensity score matching (PSM) to decrease any potential bias. (3) Results: Prior to matching, 566 patients underwent OLR, 462 LLR and 36 RLR for CRLM. After PSM, 142 patients were in each group of the OLR vs. LLR group and 22 in the OLR vs. RLR and 21 in the LLR vs. RLR groups. Blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity rates were all highly statistically significantly increased in the OLR compared to the LLR group, 636 mL vs. 353 mL, 9 vs. 5 days and 25% vs. 6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Only blood loss was significantly decreased when RLR was compared to OLR and LLR, 250 mL vs. 597 mL, and 224 mL vs. 778 mL, p < 0.008 and p < 0.04, respectively. (4) Conclusions: SIMMILR indicates that minimally invasive approaches for CRLM that follow the Milan criteria may have short term advantages. Notably, larger studies with long-term follow-up comparing robotic resections to both OLR and LLR are still needed.

Keywords: colorectal liver metastasis; hepatectomy; international; laparoscopic; laparoscopy; liver resection; minimally invasive; multicentric; robot-assisted; robotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in percentages of surgical approach used from 2004–2020 of all cases of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after matching. Blue = open liver resection (OLR), green = laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), yellow = robotic liver resection (RLR).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gagner M., Rheault M., Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg. Endosc. 1992;6:99.
    1. Abu Hilal M., McPhail M.J., Zeidan B., Zeidan S., Hallam M.J., Armstrong T., Primrose J.N., Pearce N.W. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: A comparative study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2008;34:1285–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McPhail M.J., Scibelli T., Abdelaziz M., Titi A., Pearce N.W., Abu Hilal M. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatectomy. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009;3:345–351. doi: 10.1586/egh.09.36. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cherqui D. Benign liver tumors. J. Chir. 2001;138:19–26. - PubMed
    1. Gayet B., Cavaliere D., Castel B., Carlini F., Vibert E., Mal F. Laparoscopic liver surgery for metastases of colorectal cancer: Analysis of a monocentric experience. Suppl. Tumori. 2005;4:S135–S137. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources