Successful Pregnancies, Births, and Children Development Following Oocyte Cryostorage in Female Cancer Patients During 25 Years of Fertility Preservation
- PMID: 35326578
- PMCID: PMC8946047
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061429
Successful Pregnancies, Births, and Children Development Following Oocyte Cryostorage in Female Cancer Patients During 25 Years of Fertility Preservation
Abstract
The preservation of fertility in cancer patients is a crucial aspect of modern reproductive medicine. Amenorrhea and infertility often occur after cancer therapy, worsening the quality of life. Cryopreservation of oocytes in young cancer patients is a therapeutic option for preserving fertility. A prospective study was conducted on 508 cancer patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation to preserve fertility between 1996 and 2021 including the COVID-19 pandemic period. Patients underwent ovarian stimulation, followed by egg retrieval, and oocytes were cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification. Sixty-four thawing/warming cycles were performed. Survival, fertilization, pregnancy, and birth rate over the thawing/warming cycles were obtained. The data were compared with those from a group of 1042 nononcological patients who cryopreserved supernumerary oocytes. An average of 8.8 ± 6.9 oocytes were retrieved per cycle, and 6.1 ± 4.2 oocytes were cryopreserved. With their own stored oocytes, 44 patients returned to attempt pregnancy. From a total of 194 thawed/warmed oocytes, 157 survived (80%). In total, 100 embryos were transferred in 57 transfer/cycles, and 18 pregnancies were achieved. The pregnancy rate per transfer and pregnancy rate per patient were 31% and 41%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between oncological patients and nononcological patients. A total of 15 babies were born from oncological patients. Children born showed normal growth and development. One minor malformation was detected.
Keywords: child development; fertility preservation; oncofertility; oocyte cryopreservation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):459-66.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 26604065
-
Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients.Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.067. Epub 2009 May 12. Fertil Steril. 2010. PMID: 19439285
-
Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.Fertil Steril. 2021 Jun;115(6):1511-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33712289
-
Live birth using vitrified--warmed oocytes in invasive ovarian cancer: case report and literature review.Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Jun;28(6):663-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Mar 4. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014. PMID: 24745835 Review.
-
Preservation of female fertility: The current therapeutic strategy.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;156(1):3-9. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13698. Epub 2021 Apr 21. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 33829509 Review.
Cited by
-
Oncofertility in pediatric patients: current perspectives.Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2022;26(3):165-173. doi: 10.5114/wo.2022.120362. Epub 2022 Oct 14. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2022. PMID: 36381665 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fertility-sparing surgery upon reproductive and oncologic results in ovarian cancer patients stage I (FIGO): a systematic review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08062-y. Online ahead of print. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 40407878 Review.
-
Reproductive health in Turner's syndrome: from puberty to pregnancy.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 5;14:1269009. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1269009. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 38116311 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in fertility preservation cycles before chemotherapy.ESMO Open. 2023 Aug;8(4):101597. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101597. Epub 2023 Jul 6. ESMO Open. 2023. PMID: 37421801 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility-sparing surgery: a hopeful strategy for young women with cancer.J Med Life. 2023 Jul;16(7):974-980. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0203. J Med Life. 2023. PMID: 37900072 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Longhi A., Porcu E., Petracchi S., Versari M., Conticini L., Bacci G. Reproductive functions in female patients treated with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized osteosarcoma of the extremity. Cancer Am. Cancer Soc. 2000;89:1961–1965. - PubMed
-
- Loren A.W., Mangu P.B., Beck L.N., Brennan L., Magdalinski A.J., Partridge A.H., Quinn G., Wallace W.H., Oktay K. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:2500–2510. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources