Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 10;14(6):1437.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14061437.

Prediction of Short and Long Survival after Surgery for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Affiliations

Prediction of Short and Long Survival after Surgery for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Anna Michel et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Brain metastases requiring surgical treatment determine the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. We aimed to develop the scores for the prediction of short (<6 months) and long (≥3 years) survival after BCBM surgery. Methods: Female patients with BCBM surgery between 2008 and 2019 were included. The new scores were constructed upon independent predictors for short and long postoperative survival. Results: In the final cohort (n = 95), 18 (18.9%) and 22 (23.2%) patients experienced short and long postoperative survival, respectively. Breast-preserving surgery, presence of multiple brain metastases and age ≥ 65 years at breast cancer diagnosis were identified as independent predictors of short postoperative survival. In turn, positive HER2 receptor status in brain metastases, time interval ≥ 3 years between breast cancer and brain metastases diagnosis and KPS ≥ 90% independently predicted long survival. The appropriate short and long survival scores showed higher diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of short (AUC = 0.773) and long (AUC = 0.775) survival than the breast Graded Prognostic Assessment score (AUC = 0.498/0.615). A cumulative survival score (total score) showed significant association with overall survival (p = 0.001). Conclusion: We identified predictors independently impacting the prognosis after BCBM surgery. After external validation, the presented scores might become useful tools for the selection of proper candidates for BCBM surgery.

Keywords: HER2; brain metastasis; breast cancer; score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar charts showing the association between the SS- (A)/LS- (B) scores and the survival rates at appropriate timepoints (6 months and 3 years for the SS- and LS-scores, respectively). The outcomes were reported for each score after the dichotomization into low (0–1 points) and high (2–3 points) score values.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrate the survival differences in BCBM patients with low (0-1 points) and high (2–3 points) score value: (A) SS-scores (log rank test p = 0.002). (B) LS-scores (log rank test p < 0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of different scores with regard to the prediction of short survival (A) and long survival (B) in BCBM patients. (A): demonstrated the SS-score and different GPA scores (inversed) for short survival (6 months survival). (B): demonstrated the LS-score and different GPA scores for long survival (3 years survival). Abbreviations: LS: long survival, SS: short survival, GPA: Graded Prognostic Assessment, ob: original breast, mb: modified breast, ub: updated breast, AUC: areas under the curve.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier curve for the association between the Total-score and overall survival (log-rank test p = 0.001). According to the Total-score value, the survival curves were divided into three subgroups: “−3 to −1 points”. “0 to 1 point”. “2 to 3 points”.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dunning A.M., Healey C.S., Baynes C., Maia A.T., Scollen S., Vega A., Rodriguez R., Barbosa-Morais N.L., Ponder B.A.J., Low Y.L., et al. Association of ESR1 gene tagging SNPs with breast cancer risk. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009;18:1131–1139. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn429. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taillibert S., Le Rhun E. Epidemiology of brain metastases. Cancer Radiother. 2015;19:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.11.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rostami R., Mittal S., Rostami P., Tavassoli F., Jabbari B. Brain metastasis in breast cancer: A comprehensive literature review. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2016;127:407–414. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2075-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Erratum in CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 313. - DOI - PubMed