Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 14;14(6):1483.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14061483.

Familial Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk

Affiliations

Familial Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk

Tuong L Nguyen et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Cumulus, Cumulus-percent, Altocumulus, Cirrocumulus, and Cumulus-white are mammogram risk scores (MRSs) for breast cancer based on mammographic density defined in effect by different levels of pixel brightness and adjusted for age and body mass index. We measured these MRS from digitized film mammograms for 593 monozygotic (MZ) and 326 dizygotic (DZ) female twin pairs and 1592 of their sisters. We estimated the correlations in relatives (r) and the proportion of variance due to genetic factors (heritability) using the software FISHER and predicted the familial risk ratio (FRR) associated with each MRS. The ρ estimates ranged from: 0.41 to 0.60 (standard error [SE] 0.02) for MZ pairs, 0.16 to 0.26 (SE 0.05) for DZ pairs, and 0.19 to 0.29 (SE 0.02) for sister pairs (including pairs of a twin and her non-twin sister), respectively. Heritability estimates were 39% to 69% under the classic twin model and 36% to 56% when allowing for shared non-genetic factors specific to MZ pairs. The FRRs were 1.08 to 1.17. These MRSs are substantially familial, due mostly to genetic factors that explain one-quarter to one-half as much of the familial aggregation of breast cancer that is explained by the current best polygenic risk score.

Keywords: OPERA; breast cancer; cirrocumulus; cumulus; familial risk ratio; heritability; mammogram risk score; mammographic density.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.S.D. is employed by Genetic Technologies Limited.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hopper J.L., Nguyen T.L., Schmidt D.F., Makalic E., Song Y.-M., Sung J., Dite G.S., Dowty J.G., Li S. Going beyond conventional mammographic density to discover novel mammogram-based predictors of breast cancer risk. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:627. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030627. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen T.L., Schmidt D.F., Makalic E., Dite G., Stone J., Apicella C., Bui M., MacInnis R., Odefrey F., Cawson J.N., et al. Explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: A twins and sisters study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2013;22:2395–2403. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0481. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hopper J.L. Odds per adjusted standard deviation: Comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015;182:863–867. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv193. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt D.F., Makalic E., Goudey B., Dite G.S., Stone J., Nguyen T.L., Dowty J.G., Baglietto L., Southey M.C., Maskarinec G., et al. Cirrus: An automated mammography-based measure of breast cancer risk based on textural features. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018;2:pky057. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky057. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byng J.W., Yaffe M.J., Jong R.A., Shumak R.S., A Lockwood G., Tritchler D.L., Boyd N.F. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics. 1998;18:1587–1598. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.18.6.9821201. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources