Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 18;14(6):1560.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14061560.

Vitamin D Metabolites in Nonmetastatic High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients with and without Zoledronic Acid Treatment after Prostatectomy

Affiliations

Vitamin D Metabolites in Nonmetastatic High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients with and without Zoledronic Acid Treatment after Prostatectomy

Carsten Stephan et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

There are limited and discrepant data on prostate cancer (PCa) and vitamin D. We investigated changes in three vitamin D3 metabolites in PCa patients after prostatectomy with zoledronic acid (ZA) treatment regarding their metastasis statuses over four years. In 32 patients from the ZEUS trial, 25(OH)D3, 24,25(OH)2D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 were measured with liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry at four time points. All the patients received daily calcium and vitamin D3. Bone metastases were detected in 7 of the 17 ZA-treated patients and in 5 of the 15 controls (without ZA), without differences between the groups (p = 0.725). While 25(OH)D3 and 24,25(OH)2D3 increased significantly after the study's start, with following constant values, the 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations remained unchanged. ZA treatment did not change the levels of the three metabolites. 25(OH)D3 and 24,25(OH)2D3 were not associated with the development of bone metastases. In contrast, 1,25(OH)2D3 was also higher in patients with bone metastasis before the study's start. Thus, in high-risk PCa patients after prostatectomy, 25(OH)D3, 24,25(OH)2D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 were not affected by supportive ZA treatment or by the development of metastasis over four years, with the exception of 1,25(OH)2D3, which was constantly higher in metastatic patients. There might be potential prognostic value if the results can be confirmed.

Keywords: 1,25(OH)2D3; 24,25(OH)2D3; 25(OH)D3; circulating vitamin D metabolites; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; vitamin D; zoledronic acid treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.B. and M.D. are employees of Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany. All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and no direct or indirect commercial incentives associated with publishing the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the study design and patient characteristics depending on the season of the study’s start in winter/spring (a) and summer/autumn (b). Abbreviation: ZA = zoledronic acid.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Levels of (a,b) 25(OH)D3, (c,d) 24,25(OH)2D3, and (e,f) 1,25(OH)2D3 at different time intervals of the study in the total cohort, and dependence on the season of the start of the study. Subfigures (a,c,e) present the results of the repeated-measures ANOVA for a single-factor study after treatment in the total cohort (n = 32). The corresponding subfigures (b,d,f) show the results of the two-factor study with repeated-measures ANOVA on the factor “study start” (winter/spring, n = 16, and summer/autumn, n = 16). Repeated measures were performed before the treatment (time point = 0) and 3 and 9 months after the treatment start. The last time point was 39 months (mean value) after the treatment start. Data at the time points are mean values with their 95% confidence intervals. At the error bars, the letters a, b, c, and d indicate statistically significant differences in the vitamin D3 levels between the different measuring points (at least p < 0.05; corrected values according to Holm–Sidak test): a, compared to “before study”; b, compared to 3 months; c, compared to 9 months; d, compared to ~39 months. Statistically significant differences between the metabolite levels of the two study subgroups at the respective time points are characterized by asterisks: **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; MP factor = related to the time intervals of the measuring points.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Levels of (a) 25(OH)D3, (b) 24,25(OH)2D3, and (c) 1,25(OH)2D3 before and during the ZA treatment at different time intervals of the study. Repeated measures were performed before the treatment (time point = 0) and 3 and 9 months after the treatment start. The last measuring points were 36 and 42 months (mean values) for patients without and with ZA treatment, respectively. Results of the repeated-measures two-factor ANOVA classified according to the factor ZA treatment (without ZA, n = 15; with ZA, n = 17) are shown as mean values with their 95% confidence intervals. At the error bars, the letters a, b, c, and d indicate statistically significant differences in the vitamin D3 levels between the different measuring points (at least p < 0.05; corrected values according to Holm–Sidak test): a, compared to “before study”; b, compared to 3 months; c, compared to 9 months; d, compared to ~36–42 months. No statistically significant differences for all three metabolite levels were found between the two ZA groups at the respective measuring points. Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; ZA = zoledronic acid; MP factor = related to the time intervals of the measuring points.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Levels of (a) 25(OH)D3, (b) 24,25(OH)2D3, and (c) 1,25(OH)2D3 in patients with and without developed bone metastases during the study. Repeated measures were performed before the treatment (time point = 0) and 3 and 9 months after the treatment start. The last measuring points were 27 and 42 months (mean values) for the patients with (n = 12) and without (n = 20) bone metastasis, respectively. Results of the repeated-measures two-factor ANOVA classified according to the factor metastasis are shown as mean values with their 95% confidence intervals. At the error bars, the letters a, b, c, and d indicate statistically significant differences in the vitamin D3 levels between the different measuring points (at least p < 0.05; corrected values according to Holm–Sidak test): a, compared to “before study”; b, compared to 3 months; c, compared to 9 months; d, compared to ~27–42 months. Statistically significant differences between the metabolite levels for the two study subgroups at the respective time points are characterized by asterisks: **, p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; Meta factor = related to the developed bone metastasis; MP factor = related to the time intervals of the measuring points.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change in the vitamin D3 metabolite ratio (VMR) in the total cohort during the study. The ratio [24,25(OH)2D3 to 25(OH)D3 × 100] defined as vitamin D3 metabolite ratio increased during the study. Data at the time points are mean values with their 95% confidence intervals. At the error bars, the letters a, b, c, and d indicate statistically significant differences between the levels at the different measuring points (at least p < 0.05; corrected values according to Holm–Sidak test): a, compared to “before study”; b, compared to 3 months; c, compared to 9 months; d, compared to ~39 months. Further explanations are provided in the legend of Figure 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giustina A., Bouillon R., Binkley N., Sempos C., Adler R.A., Bollerslev J., Dawson-Hughes B., Ebeling P.R., Feldman D., Heijboer A., et al. Controversies in vitamin D: A statement from the Third International Conference. JBMR Plus. 2020;4:e10417. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10417. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giustina A., Adler R.A., Binkley N., Bouillon R., Ebeling P.R., Lazaretti-Castro M., Marcocci C., Rizzoli R., Sempos C.T., Bilezikian J.P. Controversies in vitamin D: Summary Statement from an International Conference. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;104:234–240. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01414. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giustina A., Adler R.A., Binkley N., Bollerslev J., Bouillon R., Dawson-Hughes B., Ebeling P.R., Feldman D., Formenti A.M., Lazaretti-Castro M., et al. Consensus statement from 2(nd) International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2020;21:89–116. doi: 10.1007/s11154-019-09532-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouillon R., Marcocci C., Carmeliet G., Bikle D., White J.H., Dawson-Hughes B., Lips P., Munns C.F., Lazaretti-Castro M., Giustina A., et al. Skeletal and extraskeletal actions of vitamin D: Current evidence and outstanding questions. Endocr. Rev. 2019;40:1109–1151. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00126. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma Y., Johnson C.S., Trump D.L. Mechanistic insights of vitamin D anticancer effects. Vitam. Horm. 2016;100:395–431. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2015.11.003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources