Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 18;14(6):1566.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14061566.

A Brief Overview of Adaptive Designs for Phase I Cancer Trials

Affiliations
Review

A Brief Overview of Adaptive Designs for Phase I Cancer Trials

Anshul Saxena et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Phase I studies are used to estimate the dose-toxicity profile of the drugs and to select appropriate doses for successive studies. However, literature on statistical methods used for phase I studies are extensive. The objective of this review is to provide a concise summary of existing and emerging techniques for selecting dosages that are appropriate for phase I cancer trials. Many advanced statistical studies have proposed novel and robust methods for adaptive designs that have shown significant advantages over conventional dose finding methods. An increasing number of phase I cancer trials use adaptive designs, particularly during the early phases of the study. In this review, we described nonparametric and algorithm-based designs such as traditional 3 + 3, accelerated titration, Bayesian algorithm-based design, up-and-down design, and isotonic design. In addition, we also described parametric model-based designs such as continual reassessment method, escalation with overdose control, and Bayesian decision theoretic and optimal design. Ongoing studies have been continuously focusing on improving and refining the existing models as well as developing newer methods. This study would help readers to assimilate core concepts and compare different phase I statistical methods under one banner. Nevertheless, other evolving methods require future reviews.

Keywords: adaptive design; algorithm-based designs; cancer clinical trial; dose-limiting toxicity; maximum tolerated dose; nonparametric designs; parametric model-based designs; phase I trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of A+B design without dose de-escalation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of A+B design with dose de-escalation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosenberger W.F., Haines L.M. Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: A Review. Stat. Med. 2002;21:2757–2770. doi: 10.1002/sim.1229. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pervaiz S., Ul-Qayyum Z., Bangyal W.H., Gao L., Ahmad J. A systematic literature review on particle swarm optimization techniques for medical diseases detection. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2021;2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/5990999. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rukhsar L., Bangyal W.H., Ali Khan M.S., Ibrahim A., Asri A., Nisar K., Rawat D.B. Analyzing RNA-Seq Gene Expression Data Using Deep Learning Approaches for Cancer Classification. Appl. Sci. 2022;12:1850. doi: 10.3390/app12041850. - DOI
    1. Nagendran M., Chen Y., Lovejoy C.A., Gordon A.C., Komorowski M., Harvey H., Topol E.J., Ioannidis J.P., Collins G.S., Maruthappu M. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: Systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. BMJ. 2020;25:368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m689. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrer S., Shah P., Antony B., Hu J. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;40:577–591. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.05.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources