Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 18;14(6):1561.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14061561.

Interrogating the Genomic Landscape of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Potential for Patient Benefit

Affiliations
Review

Interrogating the Genomic Landscape of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Potential for Patient Benefit

Genevieve V Dall et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is a rare and aggressive gynaecological malignancy. Surgical removal and chemotherapy are commonly used to treat uLMS, but recurrence rates are high. Over the last few decades, clarification of the genomic landscape of uLMS has revealed a number of recurring mutations, including TP53, RB1, ATRX, PTEN, and MED12. Such genomic aberrations are difficult to target therapeutically or are actively targeted in other malignancies, and their potential as targets for the treatment of uLMS remains largely unexplored. Recent identification of deficiencies in homologous recombination in a minority of these tumours, however, has provided a rationale for investigation of PARP inhibitors in this sub-set. Here, we review these mutations and the evidence for therapeutic avenues that may be applied in uLMS. We also provide a comprehensive background on diagnosis and current therapeutic strategies as well as reviewing preclinical models of uLMS, which may be employed not only in testing emerging therapies but also in understanding this challenging and deadly disease.

Keywords: clinical trials; gynaecological cancer; preclinical models; rare cancer; sarcoma; targeted therapy; uterine leiomyosarcoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.L.S. reports membership in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Roche, Eisai, Sierra Oncology, Takeda, and Merck Sharp & Dohme (no honoraria were received for any advisory boards); grant/research support from Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Sierra Oncology, Roche, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, drug in kind support from Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Sierra Oncology, Roche, and BeiGene; leadership or fiduciary roles with Cancer Trials Australia, the Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group, the Cure Cancer Australia Foundation, BioGrid Australia, and OncologyOne; and travel support from AstraZeneca. The other authors made no disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of the common genetic aberrations in uLMS and their potential therapeutic targets.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. D’Angelo E., Prat J. Uterine sarcomas: A review. Gynecol. Oncol. 2010;116:131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skorstad M., Kent A., Lieng M. Uterine leiomyosarcoma—Incidence, treatment, and the impact of morcellation. A nationwide cohort study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2016;95:984–990. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12930. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toro J.R., Travis L.B., Wu H.J., Zhu K., Fletcher C.D.M., Devesa S.S. Incidence patterns of soft tissue sarcomas, regardless of primary site, in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program, 1978–2001: An analysis of 26,758 cases. Int. J. Cancer. 2006;119:2922–2930. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22239. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farid M., Ong W.S., Tan M.H., Foo L.S., Lim Y.K., Chia W.K., Soh L.T., Poon D., Lee M.J., Ho Z.C., et al. The influence of primary site on outcomes in leiomyosarcoma: A review of clinicopathologic differences between uterine and extrauterine disease. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;36:368–374. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318248dbf4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hosh M., Antar S., Nazzal A., Warda M., Gibreel A., Refky B. Uterine Sarcoma: Analysis of 13,089 Cases Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2016;26:1098–1104. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000720. - DOI - PubMed