Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 23;11(3):293.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030293.

Duration of Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Open Fractures: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Affiliations
Review

Duration of Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Open Fractures: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Niels Vanvelk et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Fracture-related infection (FRI) remains a serious complication in open fracture care. Adequate surgical treatment and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) are key factors influencing the outcome. However, data concerning the optimal duration of PAP is scarce. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of current evidence on the association between PAP duration and FRI in open fractures. A comprehensive search on 13 January 2022, in Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science and Google Scholar revealed six articles. Most studies compared either 1 day versus 5 days of PAP or included a cut-off at 72 h. Although prolonged PAP was not beneficial in the majority of patients, the variety of antibiotic regimens, short follow-up periods and unclear description of outcome parameters were important limitations that were encountered in most studies. This systematic review demonstrates a lack of well-constructed studies investigating the effect of PAP duration on FRI. Based on the available studies, prolonged PAP does not appear to be beneficial in the prevention of FRI in open fractures. However, these results should be interpreted with caution since all included studies had limitations. Future randomized trials are necessary to answer this research question definitively.

Keywords: antibiotic; duration; fracture-related infection; open fracture; prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outline of the search and selection process including exclusions and final number of studies included.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Puetzler J., Zalavras C., Moriarty T.F., Verhofstad M.H.J., Kates S.L., Raschke M.J., Rosslenbroich S., Metsemakers W.J. Clinical practice in prevention of fracture-related infection: An international survey among 1197 orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Injury. 2019;50:1208–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgenstern M., Vallejo A., McNally M.A., Moriarty T.F., Ferguson J.Y., Nijs S., Metsemakers W.J. The effect of local antibiotic prophylaxis when treating open limb fractures. Bone Jt. Res. 2018;7:447–456. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.77.BJR-2018-0043.R1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Metsemakers W.J., Kuehl R., Moriarty T.F., Richards R.G., Verhofstad M.H.J., Borens O., Kates S., Morgenstern M. Infection after fracture fixation: Current surgical and microbiological concepts. Injury. 2018;49:511–522. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gustilo R.B., Anderson J.T. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty five open fractures of long bones: Retrospective and prospective analyses. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1976;58:453–458. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197658040-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uivaraseanu B., Bungau S., Tit D.M., Fratila O., Rus M., Maghiar T.A., Maghiar O., Pantis C., Vesa C.M., Zaha D.C. Clinical, Pathological and Microbiological Evaluation of Diabetic Foot Syndrome. Medicina. 2020;56:380. doi: 10.3390/medicina56080380. - DOI - PMC - PubMed