Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 15;11(3):391.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030391.

Lagoon, Anaerobic Digestion, and Composting of Animal Manure Treatments Impact on Tetracycline Resistance Genes

Affiliations
Review

Lagoon, Anaerobic Digestion, and Composting of Animal Manure Treatments Impact on Tetracycline Resistance Genes

Getahun E Agga et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Increased demand for animal protein is met by increased food animal production resulting in large quantities of manure. Animal producers, therefore, need sustainable agricultural practices to protect environmental health. Large quantities of antimicrobials are used in commercial food animal production. Consequently, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and the resistance genes emerge and are excreted through feces. Manure management is essential for the safe disposal of animal waste. Lagoons, with or without covers, and anaerobic digesters, with the primary purpose of methane production, and composting, with the primary purpose of producing organic fertilizer, are widely used methods of manure treatment. We reviewed manure management practices and their impact on tetracycline resistance genes. Lagoons are maintained at ambient temperatures; especially uncovered lagoons are the least effective in removing tetracycline resistance genes. However, some modifications can improve the performance of lagoons: sequential use of uncovered lagoons and the use of covered lagoons resulted in a one-log reduction, while post-treatments such as biofiltration following covered lagoon treatment resulted in 3.4 log reduction. Mesophilic digestion of animal manure did not have any significant effect; only a 0.7 log reduction in tet(A) was observed in one study. While thermophilic anaerobic digesters are effective, if properly operated, they are expensive for animal producers. Aerobic thermophilic composting is a promising technology if optimized with its economic benefits. Composting of raw animal manure can result in up to a 2.5 log reduction, and postdigestion composting can reduce tetracycline resistance gene concentration by >80%. In general, manure management was not designed to mitigate antimicrobial resistance; future research is needed to optimize the economic benefits of biogas or organic fertilizer on the one hand and for the mitigation of foodborne pathogens and antimicrobial resistance on the other.

Keywords: One Health; anaerobic digestion; animal manure; antimicrobial stewardship; composting; lagoons; tetracycline resistance genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Medically important antimicrobial drugs approved for use in food-producing animals actively marketed in the United States between 2010–2019. Others: Amphenicols, Diaminopyrimidines, Fluoroquinolones (excluding 2013 through 2019), Polymyxins (excluding 2012 and 2013), and Streptogramins. Data were analyzed from FDA 2020 [19]. Guidance for Industry #213 [17] states that all antimicrobial drugs and their associated classes listed in Appendix A of FDA’s Guidance for Industry #152 [18] are considered “medically important” in human medical therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anaerobic digestion systems registered in the United States for the treatment of animal manure. Frequency of anaerobic digestion facilities by (a) operation type; (b) year anaerobic digestion facility became operational; (c) animal production system (cattle refers to beef cattle); (d) State. Data were analyzed from the Agstar livestock AD database [62].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anaerobic digestion systems registered in the United States for the treatment of animal manure. Frequency of anaerobic digestion facilities by (a) operation type; (b) year anaerobic digestion facility became operational; (c) animal production system (cattle refers to beef cattle); (d) State. Data were analyzed from the Agstar livestock AD database [62].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Henchion M., McCarthy M., Resconi V.C., Troy D. Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters. Meat Sci. 2014;98:561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pagliari P.H., He Z., Waldrip H.M. Preface. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America; Madison, WI, USA: 2019.
    1. Tiseo K., Huber L., Gilbert M., Robinson T.P., Van Boeckel T.P. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics. 2020;9:918. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120918. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. FAO . Drivers, Dynamics and Epidemiology of Antimicrobial Resistance in Animal Production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome, Italy: 2016.
    1. Van Epps A., Blaney L. Antibiotic residues in animal waste: Occurrence and degradation in conventional agricultural waste management practices. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2016;2:135–155. doi: 10.1007/s40726-016-0037-1. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources