Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 17;11(3):406.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030406.

Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Staphylococcal Infections: A Critical Reappraisal of Unmet Clinical Needs Associated with the Implementation of the Best Antibiotic Choice

Affiliations

Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Staphylococcal Infections: A Critical Reappraisal of Unmet Clinical Needs Associated with the Implementation of the Best Antibiotic Choice

Milo Gatti et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Infections associated with orthopaedic implants represent a major health concern characterized by a remarkable incidence of morbidity and mortality. The wide variety of clinical scenarios encountered in the heterogeneous world of infections associated with orthopaedic implants makes the implementation of an optimal and standardized antimicrobial treatment challenging. Antibiotic bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and drug choice/dosage regimens favouring outpatient management (i.e., long-acting or oral agents) play a major role in regards to the chronic evolution of these infections. The aim of this multidisciplinary opinion article is to summarize evidence supporting the use of the different anti-staphylococcal agents in terms of microbiological and pharmacological optimization according to bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and feasibility for outpatient regimens, and to provide a useful guide for clinicians in the management of patients affected by staphylococcal infections associated with orthopaedic implants Novel long-acting lipoglycopeptides, and particularly dalbavancin, alone or in combination with rifampicin, could represent the best antibiotic choice according to real-world evidence and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. The implementation of a multidisciplinary taskforce and close cooperation between microbiologists and clinicians is crucial for providing the best care in this scenario.

Keywords: anti-staphylococcal agents; antibiotic bone penetration; biofilm; long-term safety; orthopaedic implant-associated infections; outpatient management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.G. received personal fees from Angelini; B.V. participated on advisory boards, in a speaker’s bureau, and received research contracts, contributions and study grants from Abbott, Accelerate Diagnostics, Ada, Alifax, Angelini, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bellco Drug Corporation, bioMerieux, Inc., Biotest, Cepheid, Correvio, Gilead, Menarini, MSD Italia, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Shionogi Inc., and Thermo Fisher Scientific; A.G. received personal fees from Menarini and Medivis.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The major determinants involved in the choice of the best antibiotic strategy for the management of orthopaedic implant-associated infections.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The role of biofilm formation and the major determinants involved in the choice of antibiofilm agents. CoNS: coagulase-negative Staphylococci; MBBC: minimal biofilm bactericidal concentration; MBEC: minimal biofilm eradication concentration; MBIC: minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration; PK/PD: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic SCV: small colony variants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The features of selected anti-staphylococcal agents in relationship with major determinants required for the management of orthopaedic implant-associated infections. Green box: optimal activity/efficacy; yellow box: some concerns in activity/efficacy; red box: limited or absent activity/efficacy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Trampuz A., Widmer A.F. Infections Associated with Orthopedic Implants. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2006;19:349–356. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000235161.85925.e8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tande A.J., Patel R. Prosthetic Joint Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014;27:302–345. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zimmerli W. Clinical Presentation and Treatment of Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Infection. J. Intern. Med. 2014;276:111–119. doi: 10.1111/joim.12233. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmerli W., Trampuz A., Ochsner P.E. Prosthetic-Joint Infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:1645–1654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040181. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peel T.N., Cheng A.C., Buising K.L., Choong P.F.M. Microbiological Aetiology, Epidemiology, and Clinical Profile of Prosthetic Joint Infections: Are Current Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines Effective? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56:2386–2391. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06246-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources