Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 19;11(3):414.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030414.

The Effect of Toothpastes Containing Natural Extracts on Bacterial Species of a Microcosm Biofilm and on Enamel Caries Development

Affiliations

The Effect of Toothpastes Containing Natural Extracts on Bacterial Species of a Microcosm Biofilm and on Enamel Caries Development

Aline Silva Braga et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of herbal toothpaste on bacterial counts and enamel demineralization. Thirty-six bovine enamel samples were exposed to a microcosm biofilm using human saliva and McBain saliva (0.2% sucrose) for 5 days at 37 °C and first incubated anaerobically, then aerobically-capnophilically. The following experimental toothpaste slurries (2 × 2 min/day) were applied: (1) Vochysia tucanorum (10 mg/g); (2) Myrcia bella (5 mg/g); (3) Matricaria chamomilla (80 mg/g); (4) Myrrha and propolis toothpaste (commercial); (5) fluoride (F) and triclosan (1450 ppm F), 0.3% triclosan and sorbitol (Colgate®, positive control); (6) placebo (negative control). The pH of the medium was measured, bacteria were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and enamel demineralization was quantified using transverse microradiography. The total bacterial count was reduced by toothpaste containing Myrcia bella, Matricaria chamomilla, fluoride, and triclosan (commercial) compared to the placebo. As far as assessable, Myrcia bella, Matricaria chamomilla, and Myrrha and propolis (commercial) inhibited the outgrowth of S. mutans, while Lactobacillus spp. were reduced/eliminated by all toothpastes except Vochysia tucanorum. Mineral loss and lesion depth were significantly reduced by all toothpastes (total: 1423.6 ± 115.2 vol% × μm; 57.3 ± 9.8 μm) compared to the placebo (2420.0 ± 626.0 vol% × μm; 108.9 ± 21.17 μm). Herbal toothpastes were able to reduce enamel demineralization.

Keywords: antimicrobial strategies; dental caries; oral biofilms; plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental microcosm biofilm protocol as well as the correspondent treatments and the response variables applied to analyze the biofilm and the tooth.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The image shows the 24-well microtiter plates during the experiment (a) and after the removal of enamel specimens, leaving a print in the biofilm (b).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplot of genome counts of total bacteria, Lactobacillus spp., and Streptococcus mutans present in microcosm biofilm after treatments. (a) Boxplot of genome counts of total bacteria present in microcosm biofilm after treatments (Kruskal–Wallis/ Dunn’ multiple comparison test, p < 0.0001). (b) Boxplot of genome counts of Lactobacillus spp. present in microcosm biofilm after treatments (Kruskal–Wallis/ Dunn’ multiple comparison test, p = 0.003). Lactobacillus spp. (n = 3 Vochysia tucanorum, n = 1 Myrchia bella, n = 6 placebo). (c) Boxplot of genome counts of Streptococcus mutans present in microcosm biofilm after treatments (Kruskal–Wallis/ Dunn’ multiple comparison test, p > 0.99). S. mutans (n = 2 Vochysia tucanorum, n = 1 F and triclosan toothpaste, n = 1 placebo). Genomes per microliter of samples were determined by qPCR. Different letters show significant differences among the treatments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplot of genome counts of total bacteria, Lactobacillus spp., and Streptococcus mutans present in microcosm biofilm after treatments. (a) Boxplot of genome counts of total bacteria present in microcosm biofilm after treatments (Kruskal–Wallis/ Dunn’ multiple comparison test, p < 0.0001). (b) Boxplot of genome counts of Lactobacillus spp. present in microcosm biofilm after treatments (Kruskal–Wallis/ Dunn’ multiple comparison test, p = 0.003). Lactobacillus spp. (n = 3 Vochysia tucanorum, n = 1 Myrchia bella, n = 6 placebo). (c) Boxplot of genome counts of Streptococcus mutans present in microcosm biofilm after treatments (Kruskal–Wallis/ Dunn’ multiple comparison test, p > 0.99). S. mutans (n = 2 Vochysia tucanorum, n = 1 F and triclosan toothpaste, n = 1 placebo). Genomes per microliter of samples were determined by qPCR. Different letters show significant differences among the treatments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative TMR pictures (20×) of the artificial carious enamel lesions created using microcosm biofilm after treatment with different toothpastes. (a) Vochysia tucanorum; (b) Myrcia bella; (c) Matricaria chamomilla; (d) Myrrha and propolis toothpaste; (e) F and triclosan toothpaste (positive control); (f) Placebo (negative Control). The black arrow shows the initial caries lesions (darker in color). Placebo showed a more radiolucent area (darker) indicating more enamel demineralization compared to the other groups, which were more radiopaque (brighter), thus, less demineralized.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marsh P.D., Zaura E. Dental biofilm: Ecological interactions in health and disease. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017;44:S12–S22. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12679. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rugg-Gunn A. Dental caries: Strategies to control this preventable disease. Acta. Med. Acad. 2013;42:117–130. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.80. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marsh P.D. In sickness and in health-what does the oral microbiome mean to us? An ecological perspective. Adv. Dent. Res. 2018;29:60–65. doi: 10.1177/0022034517735295. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chenicheri S., Usha R., Ramachandran R., Thomas V., Wood A. Insight into oral biofilm: Primary, secondary and residual caries and phyto-challenged solutions. Open Dent. J. 2017;11:312–333. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010312. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ancuceanu R., Anghel A.I., Ionescu C., Hovaneț M.V., Cojocaru-Toma M., Dinu M. Clinical trials with herbal products for the prevention of dental caries and their quality: A scoping study. Biomolecules. 2019;9:884. doi: 10.3390/biom9120884. - DOI - PMC - PubMed