Humans and Goats: Improving Knowledge for a Better Relationship
- PMID: 35327171
- PMCID: PMC8944699
- DOI: 10.3390/ani12060774
Humans and Goats: Improving Knowledge for a Better Relationship
Abstract
There is consensus that the quality of the human-animal relationship (HAR) is relevant to guarantee appropriate levels of animal welfare. Given the impact that HAR may have on both goats and human beings, the aim of the present review is to elucidate: (1) how humans and goats communicate; (2) which are the factors affecting human-goat interactions; (3) how we can measure the quality of this relationship. The systematic review led to the selection of 58 relevant articles. Effective human-goat communication takes place by means of visual, tactile and auditory stimuli and, to a less extent, via olfactory and gustative stimuli. Goats have well-developed socio-cognitive abilities and rely on humans to get relevant information. A deep knowledge of goats' communication means and socio-cognitive abilities may greatly help improving the human-goat relationship. Management practices (e.g., rearing methods, amount and quality of interactions), as well as genetic selection for suitable individual traits, may contribute to improving HAR. Several measures to assess the quality of HAR have been validated, including avoidance in the pen and at the feeding rack and latency to first contact. Finally, farmers' attitudes and empathy with goats, as well as their motivation to work with animals, should be improved through appropriate training.
Keywords: Capra aegagrus hircus; animal welfare; attitude; behaviour; communication; empathy; human–animal relationship; interspecific interactions; stockperson.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Human-animal relationship influences husbandry practices, animal welfare and productivity in pig farming.Animal. 2021 Feb;15(2):100103. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100103. Epub 2020 Dec 15. Animal. 2021. PMID: 33573972
-
The human-animal relationship in dairy animals.J Dairy Res. 2020 Aug;87(S1):47-52. doi: 10.1017/S0022029920000606. Epub 2020 Jul 30. J Dairy Res. 2020. PMID: 33213584 Review.
-
Goats' Performance in Unsolvable Tasks Is Predicted by Their Reactivity Toward Humans, but Not Social Rank.Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 7;11:150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00150. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32116948 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics and trait preferences of West African Dwarf goat keepers in Ghana.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021 Jun 9;53(3):356. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02781-5. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021. PMID: 34106330
-
Heat Stress and Goat Welfare: Adaptation and Production Considerations.Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 4;11(4):1021. doi: 10.3390/ani11041021. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33916619 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Human-Animal Interactions in Dairy Goats.Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;13(12):2030. doi: 10.3390/ani13122030. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37370540 Free PMC article.
-
Touchscreen Tasks for Cognitive Testing in Domestic Goats (Capra hircus): A Pilot Study Using Odd-Item Search Training.Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;15(14):2115. doi: 10.3390/ani15142115. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40723578 Free PMC article.
-
Genome-Wide Selection Signal Analysis to Investigate Wide Genomic Heredity Divergence between Eurasian Wild Boar and Domestic Pig.Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;13(13):2158. doi: 10.3390/ani13132158. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37443955 Free PMC article.
-
Human social buffer in goats and dogs.Anim Cogn. 2024 Feb 14;27(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01861-x. Anim Cogn. 2024. PMID: 38353784 Free PMC article.
-
Education and Licensing of Horse Owners: Addressing Poor Horse Welfare in the UK.Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;15(7):1037. doi: 10.3390/ani15071037. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40218430 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Waiblinger S., Boivin X., Pedersen V., Tosi M.V., Janczak A.M., Visser E.K., Jones R.B. Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;101:185–242. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001. - DOI
-
- Estep D., Hetts S. Interactions, relationships and bonds: The conceptual basis for scientist-animal relations. In: Davis H., Balfou A., editors. The Inevitable Bond-Examining Scientist-Animal Interactions. CAB International; Cambridge, UK: 1992. pp. 6–26.
-
- Hemsworth P.H., Price E.O., Borgwardt R. Behavioural responses of domestic pigs and cattle to human kind novel stimuli. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996;50:43–56. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01067-2. - DOI
-
- Rybarczyk P., Koba Y., Rushen J., Tanida H., De Passillé A.M. Can cows discriminate people by their faces? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001;74:175–189. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00162-9. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous