Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 11;12(3):687.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030687.

Radiological Findings Increased the Successful of COVID-19 Diagnosis in Hospitalized Patients Suspected of Respiratory Viral Infection but with a Negative First SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Result

Affiliations

Radiological Findings Increased the Successful of COVID-19 Diagnosis in Hospitalized Patients Suspected of Respiratory Viral Infection but with a Negative First SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Result

Margarita L Martinez-Fierro et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological agent of COVID-19 and may evolve from asymptomatic disease to fatal outcomes. Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) screening is the gold standard to diagnose severe accurate respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but this test is not 100% accurate, as false negatives can occur. We aimed to evaluate the potential false-negative results in hospitalized patients suspected of viral respiratory disease but with a negative previous SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and analyze variables that may increase the success of COVID-19 diagnosis in this group of patients. A total of 55 hospitalized patients suspected of viral respiratory disease but with a previous negative RT-PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 were included. All the participants had clinical findings related to COVID-19 and underwent a second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Chest-computed axial tomography (CT) was used as an auxiliary tool for COVID-19 diagnosis. After the second test, 36 patients (65.5%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 group), and 19 patients (34.5%) were negative (controls). There were differences between the groups in the platelet count and the levels of D-dimer, procalcitonin, and glucose (p < 0.05). Chest CT scans categorized as COVID-19 Reporting and Data System 5 (CO-RADS 5) were more frequent in the COVID-19 group than in the control group (91.7% vs. 52.6%; p = 0.003). CO-RADS 5 remained an independent predictor of COVID-19 diagnosis in a second SARS-CoV-2 screening (p = 0.013; odds ratio = 7.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5−32.7). In conclusion, chest CT classified as CO-RADS 5 was an independent predictor of a positive second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, increasing the odds of COVID-19 diagnosis by seven times. Based on our results, in hospitalized patients with a chest CT classified as CO-RADS 5, a second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test should be mandatory when the first one is negative. This approach could increase SARS-CoV-2 detection up to 65% and could allow for isolation and treatment, thus improving the patient outcome and avoiding further contagion.

Keywords: CO-RADS; COVID-19; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; false negative; viral screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative chest-computed axial tomography (CT) slices. Each patient was screened based on anatomical abnormalities observed on chest CT scans. (A) Chest CT findings categorized as CO-RADS 5 and (B) chest CT findings classified as CO-RADS 3. CO-RADS, COVID-19 Reporting and Data System.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chest-computed axial tomography (CT) findings according to the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) classification. The study population with a negative first SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result (n = 55) underwent a second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. According to this result, they were classified into the COVID-19 group (positive RT-PCR result) or the control group (negative RT-PCR result). At the time of admission, a chest CT was carried out, and the scans were categorized by using the CO-RADS system. The graph shows the number of patients in each group based on their CO-RADS score. Most of the patients in the COVID-19 group were classified as CO-RADS 5.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pascarella G., Strumia A., Piliego C., Bruno F., Del Buono R., Costa F., Scarlata S., Agro F.E. COVID-19 diagnosis and management: A comprehensive review. J. Intern. Med. 2020;288:192–206. doi: 10.1111/joim.13091. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Weekly Epidemiological Update on COVID-19. Dec 28, 2021. [(accessed on 1 December 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on....
    1. Rahimi A., Mirzazadeh A., Tavakolpour S. Genetics and genomics of SARS-CoV-2: A review of the literature with the special focus on genetic diversity and SARS-CoV-2 genome detection. Genomics. 2021;113:1221–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.09.059. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salud S.D. Datos Abiertos Dirección General de Epidemiología. 2022. [(accessed on 1 January 2022)]. Available online: http://www.gob.mx/salud/documentos/datos-abiertos-152127.
    1. COVID-19 Tablero México. 2020. [(accessed on 1 January 2022)]. Available online: https://datos.covid-19.conacyt.mx/

LinkOut - more resources