Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 17;12(3):731.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030731.

Is Nerve Electrophysiology a Robust Primary Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Treatments for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy?

Affiliations
Review

Is Nerve Electrophysiology a Robust Primary Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Treatments for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy?

Dalal Y Al-Bazz et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

There is currently no FDA-approved disease-modifying therapy for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) is an established primary endpoint of disease-modifying therapies in DPN and clinical trials have been powered with an assumed decline of 0.5 m/s/year. This paper sought to establish the time-dependent change in NCV associated with a placebo, compared to that observed in the active intervention group. A literature search identified twenty-one double-blind, randomised controlled trials in DPN of ≥1 year duration conducted between 1971 and 2021. We evaluated changes in neurophysiology, with a focus on peroneal motor and sural sensory NCV and amplitude in the placebo and treatment groups. There was significant variability in the change and direction of change (reduction/increase) in NCV in the placebo arm, as well as variability influenced by the anatomical site of neurophysiological measurement within a given clinical trial. A critical re-evaluation of efficacy trials should consider placebo-adjusted effects and present the placebo-subtracted change in NCV rather than assume a universal annual decline of 0.5 m/s/year. Importantly, endpoints such as corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) have demonstrated early nerve repair, whilst symptoms and NCV have not changed, and should thus be considered as a viable alternative.

Keywords: diabetes; nerve electrophysiology; peripheral neuropathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search strategy. DB-RCT, double-blind randomised control trial. Figure created with https://BioRender.com (accessed on 3 February 2022).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shaw J., Zimmet P. The epidemiology of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Rev. 1999;7:245–252.
    1. Skljarevski V., Malik R.A. In: Diabetic Neuropathy: Clinical Management. Malik R.A., Veves A., editors. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ, USA: 2007. Contemporary Diabetes.
    1. Nascimento O., Pupe C., Cavalcanti E. Diabetic neuropathy. Rev. Dor. 2016;17((Suppl. S1)):46–51. doi: 10.5935/1806-0013.20160047. - DOI
    1. Yorek M.A. Vascular Impairment of Epineurial Arterioles of the Sciatic Nerve: Implications for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Rev. Diabet. Stud. RDS. 2015;12:13–28. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2015.12.13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gæde P., Lund-Andersen H., Parving H.-H., Pedersen O. Effect of a Multifactorial Intervention on Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:580–591. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706245. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources