Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 10;23(6):2979.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23062979.

MiR-183-5p Induced by Saturated Fatty Acids Hinders Insulin Signaling by Downregulating IRS-1 in Hepatocytes

Affiliations

MiR-183-5p Induced by Saturated Fatty Acids Hinders Insulin Signaling by Downregulating IRS-1 in Hepatocytes

Mai Thi Nguyen et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Excessive saturated fatty acids (SFA) uptake is known to be a primary cause of obesity, a widely acknowledged risk factor of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Although specific microRNAs (miRNAs) targeting insulin signaling intermediates are dysregulated by SFA, their effects on insulin signaling and sensitivity are largely unknown. Here, we investigated the role of SFA-induced miR-183-5p in the regulation of proximal insulin signaling molecules and the development of hepatic insulin resistance. HepG2 hepatocytes treated with palmitate and the livers of high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice exhibited impaired insulin signaling resulting from dramatic reductions in the protein expressions of insulin receptor (INSR) and insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1). Differential expression analysis showed the level of miR-183-5p, which tentatively targets the 3'UTR of IRS-1, was significantly elevated in palmitate-treated HepG2 hepatocytes and the livers of HFD-fed mice. Dual-luciferase analysis showed miR-183-5p bound directly to the 3'UTR of IRS-1 and reduced IRS-1 expression at the post-transcriptional stage. Moreover, transfection of HepG2 hepatocytes with miR-183-5p mimic significantly inhibited IRS-1 expression and hindered insulin signaling, consequently inhibiting insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis. Collectively, this study reveals a novel mechanism whereby miR-183-5p induction by SFA impairs insulin signaling and suggests miR-183-5p plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of hepatic insulin resistance in the background of obesity.

Keywords: IRS-1; insulin resistance; miR-183-5p; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HFD led to impairment of insulin signaling and induced miR-183-5p in the mouse liver. C57BL/6N male mice were fed either NFD or HFD at the age of 6 wk for 14 wks. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with either insulin (1U/kg body wt) or the vehicle for the last 30 min prior to euthanasia. (A) Representative immunoblots (2 from 8 mice/group) of insulin signaling molecules (INSR, IRS-1, Akt2, and GSK3β) and their phosphorylations (pINSR, pIRS-1, pAkt2, and pGSK3β) in the liver are shown. (BD) The respective densitometry measurements, normalized versus β-Actin. (E) The miR-183-5p levels from the liver of HFD-fed mice (closed column) and NFD-fed mice (open column) were determined using qRT-PCR. The results in immunoblots and qRT-PCR are presented as a relative ratio, normalized to NFD controls set to one. Results are presented as means ± SEMs. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 vs. controls (NFD).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Palmitate impaired insulin signaling and elevated miR-183-5p expression in HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells were pretreated with BSA (control) or palmitate (0.5 mM) for 18 h and incubated with or without 100 nM insulin for the last 30 min. (A) Representative immunoblots of insulin signaling molecules (INSR, IRS-1, Akt2, and GSK3β) and their phosphorylations (pINSR, pIRS-1, pAkt2, and pGSK3β) are shown. (BD) The respective densitometry measurements, normalized versus β-Actin. (E) The miR-183-5p levels were determined using qRT-PCR. The results in immunoblots and qRT-PCR are presented as a relative ratio, normalized to BSA controls set to one. Results are presented as means ± SEMs (n > 3). **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 vs. BSA controls.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Palmitate regulated IRS-1 and miR-183-5p expressions in a dose- and time-dependent manner. HepG2 cells were preincubated with BSA or palmitate at 0.125–0.5 mM concentrations for 6 to 18 h. The expression levels of INSR and IRS-1 protein (A,B) or miR-183-5p (C) in various doses of palmitate and incubation time are shown. The protein expressions of INSR and IRS-1 were normalized versus β-Actin. The results in immunoblots and qRT-PCR are expressed as a relative ratio, normalized to control to one. Results are presented as means ± SEMs (n > 3). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 vs. BSA controls.
Figure 4
Figure 4
MiR-183-5p directly targeted the 3’UTR of IRS-1 and suppressed IRS-1 protein expression. (A) Graphic illustration of the conserved binding site for miR-183-5p within the 3′UTR of IRS-1. (B) The sequence of miR-183-5p binding site with wild-type (wt-IRS1) or mutant (mut-IRS1) 3′UTR of IRS-1. (C) The relative luciferase activity was performed after 24 h of reversed transfection with either the miR-183-5p or scRNA control (200 nM). (D) Representative immunoblots of INSR, IRS-1, and Akt2 after transfection with scRNA, miR-183-5p mimic, or antimiR-183 for 24 h. (E) Transcriptions of IRS-1 were determined by RT-PCR (upper) and qRT-PCR (lower). The results in immunoblots and qRT-PCR are expressed as a relative ratio, normalized to control set to one. Results are presented as means ± SEMs (n > 3). **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 vs. scRNA controls.
Figure 5
Figure 5
MiR-183-5p inhibited insulin signaling and insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis. HepG2 cells were reverse transfected with 200 nM of scRNA or miR-183-5p mimic for 24 h and incubated additionally in the presence or absence of 100 nM insulin for the last 30 min before biochemical analysis. (A) Representative immunoblots of insulin signaling molecules (INSR, IRS-1, Akt2, and GSK3β) and their phosphorylations (pINSR, pIRS-1, pAkt2, and pGSK3β) are shown. (BD) The respective densitometry measurements, normalized versus β-Actin. (E) The results from glycogen assays are displayed as relative ratios against the basal (without insulin stimulation) scRNA controls. Results are presented as means ± SEMs (n > 3). **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 vs. scRNA controls.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kahn S.E., Hull R., Utzschneider K.M. Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2006;444:840–846. doi: 10.1038/nature05482. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finck B.N. Targeting Metabolism, Insulin Resistance, and Diabetes to Treat Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Diabetes. 2018;67:2485–2493. doi: 10.2337/dbi18-0024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birkenfeld A.L., Shulman G.I. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatic insulin resistance, and type 2 Diabetes. Hepatology. 2014;59:713–723. doi: 10.1002/hep.26672. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. White M.F., Kahn C.R. Insulin action at a molecular level–100 years of progress. Mol. Metab. 2021;52:101304. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101304. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samuel V.T., Shulman G.I. Mechanisms for Insulin Resistance: Common Threads and Missing Links. Cell. 2012;148:852–871. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed