Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 15;23(6):3145.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23063145.

Sex- and Genotype-Dependent Nicotine-Induced Behaviors in Adolescent Rats with a Human Polymorphism (rs2304297) in the 3'-UTR of the CHRNA 6 Gene

Affiliations

Sex- and Genotype-Dependent Nicotine-Induced Behaviors in Adolescent Rats with a Human Polymorphism (rs2304297) in the 3'-UTR of the CHRNA 6 Gene

Anjelica Cardenas et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

In human adolescents, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs2304297, in the 3'-UTR of the nicotinic receptor subunit gene, CHRNA6, has been associated with increased smoking. To study the effects of the human CHRNA6 3'-UTR SNP, our lab generated knock-in rodent lines with either C or G SNP alleles. The objective of this study was to determine if the CHRNA6 3'-UTR SNP is functional in the knock-in rat lines. We hypothesized that the human CHRNA6 3'-UTR SNP knock-in does not impact baseline but enhances nicotine-induced behaviors. For baseline behaviors, rats underwent food self-administration at escalating schedules of reinforcement followed by a locomotor assay and a series of anxiety tests (postnatal day (PN) 25-39). In separate cohorts, adolescent rats underwent 1- or 4-day nicotine pretreatment (2×, 30 μg/kg/0.1 mL, i.v.). After the last nicotine injection (PN 31), animals were assessed behaviorally in an open-field chamber, and brain tissue was collected. We show the human CHRNA6 3'-UTR SNP knock-in does not affect food reinforcement, locomotor activity, or anxiety. Further, 4-day, but not 1-day, nicotine exposure enhances locomotion and anxiolytic behavior in a genotype- and sex-specific manner. These findings demonstrate that the human CHRNA6 3'-UTR SNP is functional in our in vivo model.

Keywords: CHRNA6; adolescent; anxiety-like behavior; locomotor activity; pharmacogenetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Generation of Humanized CHRNA6 3′-Untranslated Region (UTR) SNP Rodents. Site-specific double-stranded breaks (DSB) were introduced at the CHRNA6 3′-UTR of the wild-type (WT) Sprague-Dawley (green, 95 nucleotides) via Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas9) endonuclease methods followed by the insertion of a donor vector through homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. A human CHRNA6 3′-UTR (gold, 559 nucleotides) containing either the minor or major SNP allele at nucleotide position 123 (SNP location indicated by *C or *G, respectively) was introduced by a donor vector. F2 offspring resulting from confirmed founders and F1 crossbred pups resulted in homozygous major (α6GG) and homozygous minor (α6CC) humanized CHRNA6 3′-UTR SNP rodents. Ampicillin (Amp); base pair (bp); AscI and NotI: restriction enzyme recognition sites; plasmid origin of replication (pUC ori).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The human CHRNA6 3′-UTR knock-in does not impact baseline behavior. (A) Experimental paradigm for baseline behaviors. Postnatal Day (PN), Elevated Plus Maze (EPM), and Light/Dark Box Test (LDT). (B) Mean daily 30 min response ± SEM for food self-administration at Fixed Ratio (FR)1, FR2, and FR5 schedules of reinforcement, n = 16/group. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05 Reinforced (Reinf) vs. Non-Reinforced (Non Reinf) responses. (C) Mean breakpoint ± SEM for food self-administration under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement, n = 16/group. (D) Mean total ambulatory counts ± SEM, n = 15–16/group. (E) Mean percentage (%) of time spent in the center of an open field ± SEM, n = 15–16/group. (F) Mean % of time spent in the open arm of an EPM ± SEM, n = 16/group. (G) Mean % of time spent on the light side of a Light/Dark box ± SEM, n = 8/group. * p < 0.05 females vs. males. Circles represent females and squares represent males.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nicotine-induced locomotion in humanized CHRNA6 3′-UTR SNP rats. Mean total ambulatory counts ± SEM for (A) 1-day nicotine exposure, collapsed by sex n = 13–19/group. (B) 4-day nicotine exposure, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 Nic vs Sal; ^ p < 0.05 α6CC Nic vs α6GG Nic n = 7–10/group. Saline (Sal), Nicotine (Nic). Circles represent females, and squares represent males.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Nicotine-induced anxiolytic behavior in humanized CHRNA6 3′-UTR SNP rats. Mean percent (%) time spent in center ± SEM for (A) acute (1-day) nicotine exposure *** p < 0.001 α6CC Nic vs α6CC Sal, ^^ p = 0.01 α6CC Nic vs α6GG Nic n = 13–18/group. (B) Sub-chronic (4-day) nicotine exposure, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 Nic vs Sal; ^ p < 0.05, ^^ p < 0.01 α6CC Nic vs α6GG Nic, n = 7–10/group. Saline (Sal), Nicotine (Nic). Circles represent females, and squares represent males.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Nicotine does not alter α6 nicotinic receptor subunit mRNA expression in humanized CHRNA6 3′-UTR SNP Rats. Mean dpm/mg ± SEM for sub-chronic nicotine exposed male and female rats in the (A) substantia nigra (SN), (B) anterior ventral tegmental area (aVTA), (C) posterior ventral tegmental area (pVTA), and (D) interpeduncular nucleus (IPN), n = 3–5/group. Saline (Sal), Nicotine (Nic). Circles represent females, and squares represent males.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services . The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services; Washington, DC, USA: 2014.
    1. NIDA “What Is the Scope of Tobacco, Nicotine, and e-Cigarette Use in the United States?” National Institute on Drug Abuse. [(accessed on 13 March 2022)];2022 February 8; Available online: https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/tobacco-nicotine-e-ci....
    1. Yuan M., Cross S.J., Loughlin S.E., Leslie F.M. Nicotine and the adolescent brain. J. Physiol. 2015;593:3397–3412. doi: 10.1113/JP270492. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park-Lee E.R.C., Sawdey M.D., Gentzke A.S., Cornelius M., Jamal A., Cullen K.A. Notes from the Field: E-Cigarette Use Among Middle and High School Students—National Youth Tobacco Survey. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021;70:1387–1389. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7039a4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Portugal G.S., Gould T.J. Genetic variability in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and nicotine addiction: Converging evidence from human and animal research. Behav. Brain Res. 2008;193:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.05.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed