Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3294.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063294.

Developing a Health-Spatial Indicator System for a Healthy City in Small and Midsized Cities

Jiemei Luo  1   2 , Edwin H W Chan  1   3 , Jinfeng Du  4 , Linxia Feng  4 , Peng Jiang  5 , Ying Xu  3
Affiliations

Developing a Health-Spatial Indicator System for a Healthy City in Small and Midsized Cities

Jiemei Luo et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

A recent examination of the significant role of public health has prompted calls to re-investigate how the urban environment affects public health. A vital part of the solution includes Healthy City initiatives that have been the subject of extensive policies, implications, and practices globally. However, the existing literature mainly focuses on big cities and metropolitan areas, while investigations into small and midsized cities (SMCs) are lacking, and thus reflect the underlying issues of health inequity. This study develops an indicator system for evaluating Healthy City initiatives in SMCs, linking urban design and public health, supported by the analyzed opinions from experts collected using both questionnaires and interviews. The indicator system includes six primary dimensions and 37 variables: urban form and transportation (UFT); health-friendly service (HFS); environmental quality and governance (EQG); community and facility (CF); green and open space (GOS); and ecological construction and biodiversity (ECB). A fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique was used to assess the relative importance of factors, emphasizing the importance of UFT, HFS, and EQG, with importance indexes of 0.175, 0.174, and 0.174, respectively. This indicator system is helpful for SMCs seeking to construct a Healthy City in the future, and is based on urban design and governance inputs and for enhancing the Healthy City knowledge base of cities of varied scales.

Keywords: Healthy City; built environment; indicator system; small and midsized city; urban design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research Process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual framework development.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Spatial-health indicator framework for a Healthy City in small and midsized cities.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO . Promoting Health in the Urban Context. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 1988.
    1. WHO . Implementation Framework for Phase VII (2019–2024) of the WHO European Healthy Cities Network: Goals, Requirements and Strategic Approaches. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2019.
    1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs . Highlights 2020–2021, Towards Sustainable Development for Al. United Nations; New York, NY, USA: 2021.
    1. WHO . A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper Debates, Policy and Practice, Case Studies. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2010.
    1. Del Castillo A.D., Sarmiento O.L., Reis R.S., Brownson R.C. Translating evidence to policy: Urban interventions and physical activity promotion in Bogotá, Colombia and Curitiba, Brazil. Transl. Behav. Med. 2011;1:350–360. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0038-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources