Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 12;19(6):3371.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063371.

Perception of Occupational and Environmental Risks and Hazards among Mineworkers: A Psychometric Paradigm Approach

Affiliations

Perception of Occupational and Environmental Risks and Hazards among Mineworkers: A Psychometric Paradigm Approach

Mahmaod Alrawad et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This study aims to assess workers' perception of occupational and environmental risks and hazards using the psychometric paradigm. For this purpose, data were collected using survey questionnaires from 360 mineworkers recruited from mineral and sand mines. Respondents were asked to evaluate eight occupational and environmental risks and hazards on nine commonly used risk characteristics. The principal component analysis revealed that two components, "Dreaded" and "Unknown", explained 73% percent of the total variance in workers' risk perception. The results also showed that the risk of developing an occupational disease was perceived as the most dreaded and unknown type of risk, while landslide, occupational noise, and vibration exposure were the least familiar to the respondents. A practical implication of this research is that the results may offer an insight into the employees' perceptions of the hazards and risks associated with their working environment. This could help risk management develop and implement effective risk management and communications strategies.

Keywords: occupational and environmental risks; psychometric paradigm; risk communication; risk perceptions; safety and health; safety culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Location of risks in the plane of Principal Components 1 and 2 for the study sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The overall mean risk ratings for each hazard. (Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation (SD)).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tubis A., Werbińska-Wojciechowska S., Wroblewski A. Risk Assessment Methods in Mining Industry—A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:5172. doi: 10.3390/app10155172. - DOI
    1. Verma S., Chaudhari S. Safety of Workers in Indian Mines: Study, Analysis, and Prediction. Saf. Health Work. 2017;8:267–275. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.01.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zwetsloot G.I.J.M., Kines P., Wybo J.-L., Ruotsala R., Drupsteen L., Bezemer R.A. Zero Accident Vision based strategies in organisations: Innovative perspectives. Saf. Sci. 2017;91:260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.016. - DOI
    1. Joy J. Occupational safety risk management in Australian mining. Occup. Med. (Lond.) 2004;54:311–315. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roeschmann A.Z. Risk Culture: What It Is and How It Affects an Insurer’s Risk Management: Risk Culture. Risk Manag. Insur. Rev. 2014;17:277–296. doi: 10.1111/rmir.12025. - DOI

Publication types