Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3557.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063557.

Differences between Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Results in Triathletes and Their Association with Body Composition and Body Mass Index

Affiliations

Differences between Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Results in Triathletes and Their Association with Body Composition and Body Mass Index

Szymon Price et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the method of choice to assess aerobic fitness. Previous research was ambiguous as to whether treadmill (TE) and cycle ergometry (CE) results are transferrable or different between testing modalities in triathletes. The aim of this paper was to investigate the differences in HR and VO2 at maximum exertion between TE and CE, at anaerobic threshold (AT) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) and evaluate their association with body fat (BF), fat-free mass (FFM) and body mass index (BMI). In total, 143 adult (n = 18 female), Caucasian triathletes had both Tr and CE CPET performed. The male group was divided into <40 years (n = 80) and >40 years (n = 45). Females were aged between 18 and 46 years. Body composition was measured with bioelectrical impedance before tests. Differences were evaluated using paired t-tests, and associations were evaluated in males using multiple linear regression (MLR). Significant differences were found in VO2 and HR at maximum exertion, at AT and at RCP between CE and TE testing, in both males and females. VO2AT was 38.8 (±4.6) mL/kg/min in TE vs. 32.8 (±5.4) in CE in males and 36.0 (±3.6) vs. 32.1 (±3.8) in females (p < 0.001). HRAT was 149 (±10) bpm in TE vs. 136 (±11) in CE in males and 156 (±7) vs. 146 (±11) in females (p < 0.001). VO2max was 52 (±6) mL/kg/min vs. 49 (±7) in CE in males and 45.3 (±4.9) in Tr vs. 43.9 (±5.2) in females (p < 0.001). HRmax was 183 (±10) bpm in TE vs. 177 (±10) in CE in males and 183 (±9) vs. 179 (±10) in females (p < 0.001). MLR showed that BMI, BF and FFM are significantly associated with differences in HR and VO2 at maximum, AT and RCP in males aged >40. Both tests should be used independently to achieve optimal fitness assessments and further training planning.

Keywords: heart rate; triathlon training; ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SW is the owner of the Sportslab clinic. Other authors have no conflict to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regression analysis for males in subgroup >40 years. Legend: Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between differences in treadmill and cycle ergometer test results, and BMI, body fat and fat-free mass in amateur male triathletes. The figure presents the most important (highest R2) relationships in the group of males >40 years of age (n = 40) as linear regression graphs. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); HR max, maximal heart rate (bpm); VO2 max, maximum oxygen uptake (mL/min/kg).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chambers D.J., Wisely N.A. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing-a beginner’s guide to the nine-panel plot. BJA Educ. 2019;19:158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.01.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guazzi M., Adams V., Conraads V., Halle M., Mezzani A., Vanhees L., Arena R., Fletcher G.F., Forman D.E., Kitzman D.W., et al. EACPR/AHA Scientific Statement. Clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation. 2012;126:2261–2274. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826fb946. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herdy A.H., Ritt L.E.F., Stein R., de Araújo C.G.S., Milani M., Meneghelo R.S., Ferraz A.S., Hossri C., de Almeida A.E.M., Fernandes-Silva M.M., et al. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test: Background, Applicability and Interpretation. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2016;107:467–481. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galán-Rioja M.Á., González-Mohíno F., Poole D.C., González-Ravé J.M. Relative Proximity of Critical Power and Metabolic/Ventilatory Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50:1771–1783. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01314-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones A.M., Vanhatalo A. The ‘Critical Power’ Concept: Applications to Sports Performance with a Focus on Intermittent High-Intensity Exercise. Sports Med. 2017;47:65–78. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0688-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources