Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3644.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063644.

Shared Decision Making in the Psychiatric Inpatient Setting: An Ethnographic Study about Interprofessional Psychiatric Consultations

Affiliations

Shared Decision Making in the Psychiatric Inpatient Setting: An Ethnographic Study about Interprofessional Psychiatric Consultations

Caroline Gurtner et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Shared decision making is increasingly receiving attention in health care and might improve both the quality of care and patient outcomes. Nevertheless, due to its complexity, implementation of shared decision making in clinical practice seems challenging. This ethnographic study aimed to gain a better understanding of how psychiatric inpatients and the interprofessional care team interact during regular interprofessional psychiatric consultations. Data were collected through participant observation on two different psychiatric wards in a large psychiatric hospital in Switzerland. The observation focused on the contextual aspects of interprofessional patient consultations, the communication and interaction as well as the extent to which patients were involved in decision making. Participants included patients, psychiatrists, junior physicians, nurses, psychologists, social workers and therapists. We observed 71 interprofessional psychiatric consultations and they differed substantially in both wards in terms of context (place and form) and culture (way of interacting). On the contrary, results showed that the level of patient involvement in decision making was comparable and depended on individual factors, such as the health care professionals' communication style as well as the patients' personal initiative to be engaged. The main topics discussed with the patients related to pharmacotherapy and patient reported symptoms. Health care professionals in both wards used a rather unidirectional communication style. Therefore, in order to promote patient involvement in the psychiatric inpatient setting, rather than to focus on contextual factors, consultations should follow a specific agenda and promoting a bidirectional communication style for all parties involved is strongly recommended.

Keywords: clinical practice; communication; interprofessional psychiatric consultations; mental illness; participant observation; patient involvement; patient-centered care; psychiatric disorder; psychiatric inpatient setting; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interprofessional psychiatric consultation in the patient’s room (Ward A).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interprofessional psychiatric consultation in meeting room with patient (Ward B).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scholl I., Zill J.M., Härter M., Dirmaier J. An integrative model of patient centeredness: A systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107828. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Håkansson Eklund J., Holmström I.K., Kumlin T., Kaminsky E., Skoglund K., Höglander J., Sundler A.J., Condén E., Summer Merenius M. Same same or different? A review of reviews of person-centred and patient-centred care. Patient Educ. Couns. 2019;1:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holman H., Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. BMJ. 2000;320:526–527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7234.526. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Framework on Integrated, People-Centred Health Services: Report by the Secretariat. [(accessed on 15 December 2021)]. Available online: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_39-en.pdf.
    1. Härter M., Moumjid N., Cornuz J., Elwyn G., van der Weijden T. Shared decision making in 2017: International accomplishments in policy, research and implementation. Z. Für Evidenz Fortbild. Und Qual. Im Gesundh. 2017;123:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.024. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources