Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 20;19(6):3689.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063689.

Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla

Affiliations

Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla

Sarit Naishlos et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate the esthetic outcome of ridge augmentation using cancellous bone-block allografts, late implant placement, and immediate loading in the atrophic anterior maxilla, by PES (pink esthetic score) and WES (white esthetic score) indexes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were bone loss of at least 3 mm horizontally and 3 mm vertically according to preliminary CBCT; ridge augmentation using cancellous bone-block allografts; six months later the implant insertion and immediately loaded. PES-WES index was used for esthetic assessment of soft tissues surrounding the final implant-supported prosthesis (ISP). Results: All twenty-five successive individuals were included. The mean follow-up was 12.1 ± 56 months (range, 42−90 months). The mean PES index and WES index were 7 ± 1.74 (range: 5−10) and 8.4 ± 2.12 (range: 5−10), respectively. The mean total combination of PES index and WES index (PES/WES) was 15.3 ± 2.85 (range: 12−20). All ISPs had an overall score >12 (the defined threshold of clinical acceptability). Conclusions: Ridge augmentation in the atrophic anterior maxilla using cancellous bone-block allografts and immediate loading allows a stable esthetic result of the soft and hard tissues over the years (follow-up of 42−90 months).

Keywords: PES/WES; allograft; bone-block; immediate loading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Deficient alveolar ridge.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cancellous bone-block fixation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Block grafts incorporated into the surrounding bone.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Restoration interocclusal relation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean PES value of each parameter.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean WES value of each parameter.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mean total PES and WES value.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Tooth 22 was reconstructed. PES + WES score was16.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boardman N., Darby I., Chen S. A retrospective evaluation of aesthetic outcomes for single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2016;27:443–451. doi: 10.1111/clr.12593. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grunder U., Gracis S., Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2005;25:113–119. - PubMed
    1. Belser U.C., Grütter L., Vailati F., Bornstein M.M., Weber H.P., Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: A cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J. Periodontol. 2009;80:140–151. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lanza A., Di Francesco F., De Marco G., Femiano F., Itro A. Clinical application of the PES/WES index on natural teeth: Case report and literature review. Case Rep. Dent. 2017;2017:9659062. doi: 10.1155/2017/9659062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vidigal G., Groisman M., Clavijo V., Santos I., Fischer R. Evaluation of pink and white esthetic scores for immediately placed and provisionally restored implants in the anterior maxilla. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2017;32:625–632. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5149. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources