Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 14;15(6):2141.
doi: 10.3390/ma15062141.

On-Demand Wettability via Combining fs Laser Surface Structuring and Thermal Post-Treatment

Affiliations

On-Demand Wettability via Combining fs Laser Surface Structuring and Thermal Post-Treatment

Deividas Čereška et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

Laser surface texturing (LST) is one of the surface modification methods that increase or provide new abilities for the material surface. Textured surfaces could be applied in different industrial areas to reduce wear and friction, promote anti-fouling, improve osseointegration, and other similar uses. However, LST is still in development and for reaching industrial level further optimization is required. In this paper, different metal alloy surfaces were fabricated with several patterns using the same laser parameters on each material and the results were compared. This could lead to possible optimization on the industrial level. Furthermore, research on the wettability properties of material and texture patterns depending on heat treatment in different temperatures was performed, showing complete control for wettability (from hydrophilic to hydrophobic).

Keywords: femtosecond laser; heat treatment; hydrophilic; hydrophobic; laser fabrication; laser texturing; superhydrophilic; superhydrophobic; wettability; wettability transformation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Wettability test of samples. (a)—post fabrication, (b)—post cleaning, (c)—post heat treatment, (d)—water residue. Codes for surface features 1:1—dimples; 1:2—LIPSS; 2:1—grooves; 2:2—pillars. Metals used are labeled in (a).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Microscope pictures, with ×50 magnification of each sample dimple texture. (a)—17-4PH stainless steel, (b)—PH13 stainless steel, (c)—Ti6Al4V titanium, (d)—2024 T3 aluminum, (e)—7050 aluminum.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Microscope pictures, with ×100 magnification, of each sample LIPSS texture. (a)—17-4PH stainless steel, (b)—PH13 stainless steel, (c)—Ti6Al4V titanium, (d)—2024 T3 aluminum, and (e)—7050 aluminum.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Microscope pictures, with ×50 magnification of each sample groove texture. (a)—17-4PH stainless steel, (b)—PH13 stainless steel, (c)—Ti6Al4V titanium, (d)—2024 T3 aluminum, and (e)—7050 aluminum.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Microscope pictures with ×50 magnification of each sample pillar texture. (a)—17-4PH stainless steel, (b)—PH13 stainless steel, (c)—Ti6Al4V titanium, (d)—2024 T3 aluminum, and (e)—7050 aluminum.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Topography, with ×50 magnification of each sample dimple texture. (a)—17-4PH stainless steel, (b)—PH13 stainless steel, (c)—Ti6Al4V titanium, (d)—2024 T3 aluminum, and (e)—7050 aluminum.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Topography, with ×100 magnification of each sample LIPSS texture. (a)—17-4PH stainless steel, (b)—PH13 stainless steel, (c)—Ti6Al4V titanium, (d)—2024 T3 aluminum, and (e)—7050 aluminum.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Topography, with ×50 magnification of each sample grooves texture. (a)—17-4PH stainless steel, (b)—PH13 stainless steel, (c)—Ti6Al4V titanium, (d)—2024 T3 aluminum, and (e)—7050 aluminum.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Topography, with ×50 magnification of each sample pillars texture. (a)—17-4PH stainless steel, (b)—PH13 stainless steel, (c)—Ti6Al4V titanium, (d)—2024 T3 aluminum, and (e)—7050 aluminum.
Figure 10
Figure 10
(a)—The contact angle of different patterns on aluminum surface dependence heat treatment in different temperatures. (b,c)—the lowest and highest acquired contact angle and temperatures needed to induce it.
Figure 11
Figure 11
(a)—The contact angle of different patterns on steel surface dependence heat treatment in different temperatures. (b,c)—the lowest and highest acquired contact angle and temperatures needed to induce it.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jonušauskas L., Mackevičiūtė D., Kontenis G., Purlys V. Femtosecond lasers: The ultimate tool for high-precision 3D manufacturing. Adv. Opt. Technol. 2019;8:241–251. doi: 10.1515/aot-2019-0012. - DOI
    1. Barner-Kowollik C., Bastmeyer M., Blasco E., Delaittre G., Muller P., Richter B., Wegener M. 3D Laser Micro- and Nanoprinting: Challenges for Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:15828–15845. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704695. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butkutė A., Jonušauskas L. 3D Manufacturing of Glass Microstructures Using Femtosecond Laser. Micromachines. 2021;12:499. doi: 10.3390/mi12050499. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vorobyev A.Y., Guo C. Femtosecond Laser Modification of Material Wetting Properties: A Brief Review. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2012;4:432–438. doi: 10.1166/sam.2012.1298. - DOI
    1. Shchedrina N., Karlagina Y., Itina T.E., Ramos A., Correa D., Tokmacheva-Kolobova A., Manokhin S., Lutoshina D., Yatsuk R., Krylach I., et al. Wetting angle stability of steel surface structures after laser treatment. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2020;52:163. doi: 10.1007/s11082-020-02280-1. - DOI

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources