Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 16;15(6):2194.
doi: 10.3390/ma15062194.

Bioactive Glasses in Periodontal Regeneration: Existing Strategies and Future Prospects-A Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Bioactive Glasses in Periodontal Regeneration: Existing Strategies and Future Prospects-A Literature Review

Valeria Cannillo et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

The present review deals with bioactive glasses (BGs), a class of biomaterials renowned for their osteoinductive and osteoconductive capabilities, and thus widely used in tissue engineering, i.e., for the repair and replacement of damaged or missing bone. In particular, the paper deals with applications in periodontal regeneration, with a special focus on in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies. The study reviewed eligible publications, identified on the basis of inclusion/exclusion criteria, over a ranged time of fifteen years (from 1 January 2006 to 31 March 2021). While there are many papers dealing with in vitro tests, only a few have reported in vivo (in animal) research, or even clinical trials. Regardless, BGs seem to be an adequate choice as grafts in periodontal regeneration.

Keywords: animal model; bioactive glasses; bone regeneration; clinical trials; coatings; in vitro tests; in vivo tests; periodontal regeneration; scaffolds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
BGs use as regenerative surgical treatment in dentistry.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic illustration of the BGs effect on periodontal cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Articles distribution in clinical/in vitro/in vivo studies in periodontal regeneration with BGs, from 2006 to 2021.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Different types of BGs used in clinical studies in periodontal patients from 2006 to 2021.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Flow diagram of the included articles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Larry R., Hench L. The story of Bioglass. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2006;17:967–978. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones J.R. Reprint of: Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 2015;23:S53–S82. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alves E.G.L., Serakides R., Rosado I.R., Pereira M.M., Ocarino N.M., Oliveira H.P., Góes A.M., Rezende C.M.F. Effect of the ionic product of bioglass 60s on osteoblastic activity in canines. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:247. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0558-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taherkhani S., Moztarzadeh F. Influence of strontium on the structure and biological properties of sol–gel-derived mesoporous bioactive glass [MBG] powder. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2016;78:539–549. doi: 10.1007/s10971-016-3995-2. - DOI
    1. Hoppe A., Güldal N.S., Boccaccini A.R. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2757–2774. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources