The Use of a Fixed 50:50 Mixture of Nitrous Oxide and Oxygen to Reduce Lumbar Puncture-Induced Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 35329815
- PMCID: PMC8953352
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061489
The Use of a Fixed 50:50 Mixture of Nitrous Oxide and Oxygen to Reduce Lumbar Puncture-Induced Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Lumbar puncture (LP) is stressful and often painful. We evaluated the efficacy of a fixed 50% nitrous oxide−oxygen mixture (50%N2O-O2) versus placebo to reduce immediate procedural pain and anxiety during LP performed in an emergency setting. We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving adults who needed a cerebrospinal fluid analysis in an emergency department. Patients were randomly assigned to inhale either 50%N2O-O2 or medical air. The primary endpoint, assessed using a numerical scale, was the maximum pain felt by the patient during the procedure and the maximum anxiety and satisfaction as secondary outcomes. Eighty-eight patients were randomized and analyzed (ITT). The maximal pain was 5.0 ± 2.9 for patients receiving air and 4.2 ± 3.0 for patients receiving 50%N2O-O2 (effect-size = −0.27 [−0.69; 0.14], p = 0.20). LP-induced anxiety was 4.7 ± 2.8 vs. 3.7 ± 3.7 (p = 0.13), and the proportion of patients with significant anxiety (score ≥ 4/10) was 72.7% vs. 50.0% (p = 0.03). Overall satisfaction was higher among patients receiving 50%N2O-O2 (7.4 ± 2.4 vs. 8.9 ± 1.6, p < 0.001). No serious adverse events were attributable to 50%N2O-O2 inhalation. Although inhalation of 50%N2O-O2 failed to reduce LP-induced pain in an emergency setting, it tended to reduce anxiety and significantly increased patient satisfaction.
Keywords: anxiety; emergency department; lumbar puncture; nitrous oxide; pain; procedural pain.
Conflict of interest statement
M.N. has nothing to disclose. L.M. has nothing to disclose. B.P. has received fees from Biogen unrelated to the submitted work. J.-B.B.-M. has nothing to disclose. F.M. has served as a consultant for Alexion, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi, been a speaker for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, and has received grants from LFB. J.R. has nothing to disclose. J.S. has nothing to disclose. S.S.-A has nothing to disclose. L.B. has nothing to disclose. P.C. reports fees from Teva, Sanofi, Merck, Roche, Novartis, and Actelion, and non-financial support from MedDay and Biogen unrelated to the submitted work. X.M. has received personal fees from Allergan, Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Grünenthal, Lilly, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, TBWA, and Teva, and non-financial support from SOS Oxygène unrelated to the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Quincke H. Verhandlungen des Kongresses für Innere Medizin; Proceedings of the Zehnter Congress; Wiesbaden, Germany. 15–18 April 1891; pp. 321–331.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources