Evaluation of Indigenous Candida oleophila and Candida boidinii in Monoculture and Sequential Fermentations: Impact on Ethanol Reduction and Chemical Profile in Chilean Sauvignon Blanc Wines
- PMID: 35330261
- PMCID: PMC8955371
- DOI: 10.3390/jof8030259
Evaluation of Indigenous Candida oleophila and Candida boidinii in Monoculture and Sequential Fermentations: Impact on Ethanol Reduction and Chemical Profile in Chilean Sauvignon Blanc Wines
Abstract
The study of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine fermentations allows the exploration of new alternatives for the reduction of ethanol in wines. The objective of this work was to evaluate the fermentation capacity of two indigenous Candida yeasts (C. oleophila and C. boidinii) in monoculture and sequential fermentations (laboratory and microvinification scale) to produce Chilean Sauvignon Blanc wine. Fermentations were monitored by the determination of ethanol, glycerol, organic acids, and residual sugars. The results indicated that at the laboratory scale for both the monoculture and sequential fermentations it was possible to reduce the ethanol concentration on 0.77% v/v (monoculture) and 1.5% v/v (sequential) for C. oleophila and 0.50% v/v (monoculture) and 0.04% v/v (sequential) for C. boidinii compared to S. cerevisiae (12.87% v/v). Higher glycerol concentrations were produced in monoculture than sequential fermentations (C. oleophila: 9.47 g/L and C. boidinii 10.97 g/L). For microvinifications, the monoculture and sequential fermentations with C. boidinii managed to reduce ethanol content by 0.17% v/v and 0.54% v/v, respectively, over the S. cerevisiae control (13.74% v/v). In the case of C. oleophila, the reduction was only observed in sequential fermentations with 0.62% v/v. Interestingly, grapes with higher sugar concentration resulted in wines with lees ethanol concentrations. This might be associated to the use of C. oleophila (13.12% v/v) and C. boidinii (13.20% v/v) in sequential fermentations microvinification scale.
Keywords: Candida sp.; ethanol reduction; non-Saccharomyces; wine fermentation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Zhang B., Tang C., Yang D., Liu H., Xue J., Duan C., Yan G. Effects of three indigenous non-Saccharomyces yeasts and their pairwise combinations in co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on volatile compounds of Petit Manseng wines. Food Chem. 2022;368:130807. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130807. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen K., Escott C., Loira I., del Fresno J.M., Morata A., Tesfaye W., Calderon F., Suárez-Lepe J.A., Han S., Benito S. Use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts and oenological tannin in red winemaking: Influence on colour, aroma and sensorial properties of young wines. Food Microbiol. 2018;69:51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.07.018. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Van Wyk N., von Wallbrunn C., Swiegers J.H., Pretorius I.S. Biotechnology of Wine Yeasts. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020.
-
- Gao F., Zeng G., Wang B., Xiao J., Zhang L., Cheng W., Wang H., Li H., Shi X. Discrimination of the geographic origins and varieties of wine grapes using high-throughput sequencing assisted by a random forest model. Lwt. 2021;145:111333. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111333. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases