Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 3:6:10.
doi: 10.18332/ejm/145789. eCollection 2022.

The effect of formal fetal movement counting on maternal psychological outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nazia AlAmri  1 , Valerie Smith  2
Affiliations
Review

The effect of formal fetal movement counting on maternal psychological outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nazia AlAmri et al. Eur J Midwifery. .

Abstract

Introduction: Formally counting fetal movements in pregnancy is one of the oldest methods to assess fetal well-being. Although not routinely recommended in contemporary maternity care, due to a lack of evidence of its effectiveness, formal fetal movement counting is still practiced in many birth settings. Requesting women to formally count their fetal movements in a structured, objective way that can potentially improve maternal subjective outcomes such as worry or concern. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of formal fetal movement counting versus no formal counting, on maternal worry, concern or anxiety, and maternal-fetal attachment (MFA). Secondary outcomes were compliance with the intervention (counting method) and hospital admission/attendance for fetal activity concerns.

Methods: CINAHL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched systematically for eligible studies from inception dates to June 2020, supplemented by searches of trial databases, grey literature and the reference lists of included studies. Randomized controlled and quasi-randomized trials were included in the review.

Results: Nine studies reported across 15 publications were included involving 70824 pregnant women. The results showed that MFA levels were significantly higher in women who formally counted fetal movements than those who did not (standardized mean difference=0.72; 95% CI: 0.10-1.33, five studies, 1565 women). There were no differences between the groups in maternal anxiety or worry/concern outcomes. Attendance or admission rates for reduced fetal movements, or concern for fetal activity, did not differ between the groups (OR=1.36; 95% CI: 0.97-1.91, three studies, 1947 women). Compliance in completing fetal movement charts varied, ranging 45-90%, although definitions of compliance differed across studies, which may have affected rates.

Conclusions: This review has found that formal fetal movement counting in pregnancy has no detrimental effects on maternal psychological or emotional status and positively affects maternal-fetal attachment. Although current evidence does not support the use of formal fetal movement counting for improving perinatal outcomes, such as stillbirth and neonatal death, the results of this review are helpful for clinicians in discussing fetal movements in pregnancy and in discussing the optional methods available to women who may be advised to or choose to objectively assess fetal movements using a formal fetal movement counting method.

Keywords: fetal movement assessment; maternal–fetal attachment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search and selection process
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maternal-fetal-attachment
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hospital attendance
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Malm MC, Rådestad I, Rubertsson C, Hildingsson I, Lindgren H. Women's experiences of two different self-assessment methods for monitoring fetal movements in full-term pregnancy-a crossover trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):349. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frøen JF, Heazell AE, Tveit JV, Saastad E, Fretts RC, Flenady V. Fetal movement assessment. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32(4):243–246. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altini M, Mullan P, Rooijakkers M, et al. Detection of fetal kicks using body-worn accelerometers during pregnancy: Trade-offs between sensors number and positioning. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016:5319–5322. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591928. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avci R, Wilson JD, Escalona-Vargas D, Eswaran H. Tracking Fetal Movement Through Source Localization From Multisensor Magnetocardiographic Recordings. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018;22(3):758–765. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2690879. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daly LM, Boyle FM, Gibbons K, Le H, Roberts J, Flenady V. Mobile applications providing guidance about decreased fetal movement: Review and content analysis. Women Birth. 2019;32(3):e289–e296. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.020. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources