Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 7:12:855182.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.855182. eCollection 2022.

Intracranial Metastatic Disease: Present Challenges, Future Opportunities

Affiliations
Review

Intracranial Metastatic Disease: Present Challenges, Future Opportunities

Alyssa Y Li et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a prevalent complication of cancer that significantly limits patient survival and quality of life. Over the past half-century, our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of IMD has improved and enabled the development of surveillance and treatment algorithms based on prognostic factors and tumor biomolecular characteristics. In addition to advances in surgical resection and radiation therapy, the treatment of IMD has evolved to include monoclonal antibodies and small molecule antagonists of tumor-promoting proteins or endogenous immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging as well as the development of new serological assays to detect brain metastases promise to revolutionize IMD diagnosis. In this review, we will explore current treatment principles in patients with IMD, including the emerging role of targeted and immunotherapy in select primary cancers, and discuss potential areas for further investigation.

Keywords: brain metastases; immunotherapy; intracranial metastatic disease (IMD); minimally invasive surgery; neurosurgery; radiation therapy; screening; targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SD acts as a consultant for Medexus and is on the advisory board for the Subcortical Surgery Group and Xpan Medical as well as the Speaker’s Board for the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, and Society for NeuroOncology. KJ is a speaker/advisor board/consultant for: Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Apo Biologix, Eli Lilly, Esai, Exact Sciences, Knight Therapeutics, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Purdue Pharma, Roche, Seagen, Viatris; and receives research funding from Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scoccianti S, Ricardi U. Treatment of Brain Metastases: Review of Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials. Radiother Oncol (2012) 102(2):168–79. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Habbous S, Forster K, Darling G, Jerzak K, Holloway CMB, Sahgal A, et al. . Incidence and Real-World Burden of Brain Metastases From Solid Tumors and Hematologic Malignancies in Ontario: A Population-Based Study. Neurooncol Adv (2021) 3(1):vdaa178. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa178 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zakaria R, Das K, Bhojak M, Radon M, Walker C, Jenkinson MD. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Brain Metastases: Diagnosis to Prognosis. Cancer Imaging (2014) 14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1470-7330-14-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Winther-Larsen A, Hviid CVB, Meldgaard P, Sorensen BS, Sandfeld-Paulsen B. Neurofilament Light Chain as A Biomarker for Brain Metastases. Cancers (2020) 12(10):2852. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102852 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatia A, Birger M, Veeraraghavan H, Um H, Tixier F, McKenney AS, et al. . MRI Radiomic Features Are Associated With Survival in Melanoma Brain Metastases Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Neuro-Oncology (2019) 21(12):1578–86. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz141 - DOI - PMC - PubMed