Effectiveness and Economic Evaluation of Polyene Phosphatidyl Choline in Patients With Liver Diseases Based on Real-World Research
- PMID: 35330831
- PMCID: PMC8940240
- DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.806787
Effectiveness and Economic Evaluation of Polyene Phosphatidyl Choline in Patients With Liver Diseases Based on Real-World Research
Abstract
Aims: Liver disease has high prevalence, number, and disease burden in China, and polyene phosphatidyl choline (PPC) is a widely used liver protective drug. We aim to explore the effectiveness and economy of PPC in patients with liver diseases based on real-world research and compare with other hepatoprotective drugs. Methods: This is a "three-phase" study from three medical centers, including descriptive study of patients using PPC injection, self-control case study of patients using PPC injection, and specific-disease cohort study of patients using PPC injection or control drugs. The major measurements of liver function for effectiveness analysis were the alanine transaminase (ALT) level changes and recovery rate. The main statistical methods were Wilcoxon signed rank test, χ 2 test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Propensity score matching was applied to reduce bias. Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost minimization analysis, and sensitivity analysis were used for economic evaluation. Results: PPC alone or in combination with glutathione and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate shows less total hospitalization cost (p < 0.05) and smaller cost-effectiveness ratio and was effective in protecting liver function, especially in patients with liver transplantation or postoperation of nontumor liver disease (ALT decreased significantly after PPC treatment; p < 0.05). Glutathione and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate combined with PPC could enhance the protective function of liver. Conclusion: PPC was an effective and economic liver protective drug in patients with specific liver diseases, and PPC could enhance the liver protective function of glutathione and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate.
Keywords: economic evaluation; effectiveness; liver disease; liver protective drug; polyene phosphatidyl choline; real-world research.
Copyright © 2022 Fan, Li, Yu, Luo, Zheng, Hao, Wang, Gao, Zhang and Feng.
Conflict of interest statement
Author ZY, Z-YW, and FG are employed by Beijing Medicinovo Technology Co. Ltd., China. Author XH is employed by Dalian Medicinovo Technology Co. Ltd., China. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Boersma C., Voors A. A., Visser S. T., de Jong-van den Berg L. T., Postma M. J. (2010). Cost Effectiveness of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Monotherapy in Patients with Hypertension in the Netherlands: a Comparative Analysis Using Clinical Trial and Drug Utilization Data. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 10 (1), 49–54. 10.2165/11319570-000000000-00000 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Committee of the Treatment with Polyenphosphatidylcholine in Patients with Liver diseases.Experts Consensus on the Treatment with Polyenphosphatidylcholine in Patients with Liver Diseases. Chin. J. Liver Dis. 2017;29(6):331.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
