Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 7:16:826831.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.826831. eCollection 2022.

Selectivity and Sociality: Aggression and Affiliation Shape Vole Social Relationships

Affiliations
Review

Selectivity and Sociality: Aggression and Affiliation Shape Vole Social Relationships

Nicole S Lee et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

The formation of selective social relationships is not a requirement of group living; sociality can be supported by motivation for social interaction in the absence of preferences for specific individuals, and by tolerance in place of social motivation. For species that form selective social relationships, these can be maintained by preference for familiar partners, as well as by avoidance of or aggression toward individuals outside of the social bond. In this review, we explore the roles that aggression, motivation, and tolerance play in the maintenance of selective affiliation. We focus on prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) as rodent species that both exhibit the unusual tendency to form selective social relationships, but differ with regard to mating system. These species provide an opportunity to investigate the mechanisms that underlie social relationships, and to compare mechanisms supporting pair bonds with mates and same-sex peer relationships. We then relate this to the role of aggression in group composition in a comparative context.

Keywords: affiliation; aggression; meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus); prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster); selectivity; social motivation; tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Together with affiliation, aggression shapes the presence and nature of social groups. The vast majority of rodents are solitary, such as the Syrian hamster. Differences in the amount or extent of aggression (x-axis) shape group formation, with low aggression and territoriality promoting gregarious group structures (e.g., mice, rats, and spiny mice) that may be flexible in size and composition. The generality vs. specificity (y-axis) of how aggression is targeted shapes the selectivity of groups for specific known members. Selectivity may be maintained by “prosocial” factors such as motivation for social bonds, as well as by lack of aggression and intolerance toward group members vs. strangers. Highly selective species such as prairie voles exhibit both high levels of affiliation and stranger aggression, while less selective groups such as winter-phenotype meadow voles show preference for familiar individuals in the absence of social motivation or intense aggression. Photo credits: solitary rodent (Syrian hamster; The Rohit CC-BY NC 2.0), gregarious groups (Mice; Pixabay user Kapa65; Spiny mice; Aubrey Kelly by permission), selective groups (meadow voles and prairie voles; Beery Lab).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahern T. H., Olsen S., Tudino R., Beery A. K. (2021). Natural variation in the oxytocin receptor gene and rearing interact to influence reproductive and nonreproductive social behavior and receptor binding. Psychoneuroendocrinology 128:105209. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105209 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albers H. E. (2012). The regulation of social recognition, social communication and aggression: vasopressin in the social behavior neural network. Hormones Behav. 61 283–292. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.10.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anacker A. M. J., Christensen J. D., LaFlamme E. M., Grunberg D. M., Beery A. K. (2016a). Septal oxytocin administration impairs peer affiliation via V1a receptors in female meadow voles. Psychoneuroendocrinology 68 156–162. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.02.025 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anacker A. M. J., Reitz K. M., Goodwin N. L., Beery A. K. (2016b). Stress impairs new but not established relationships in seasonally social voles. Hormones Behav. 79 52–57. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.01.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aragona B. J., Liu Y., Curtis J. T., Stephan F. K., Wang Z. (2003). A critical role for nucleus accumbens dopamine in partner-preference formation in male prairie voles. J. Neurosci. 23 3483–3490. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03483.2003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed