Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 24;14(1):46.
doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00434-0.

CrossFit® open performance is affected by the nature of past competition experiences

Affiliations

CrossFit® open performance is affected by the nature of past competition experiences

Gerald T Mangine et al. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the relationships between past competition performances and 2020 CrossFit® Open (CFO) performance.

Methods: A random selection from the top one thousand athletes (n = 220, 28.5 ± 4.4 years, 178 ± 7 cm, 87.5 ± 10.2 kg) were selected for this study. Overall and weekly performances (including ranks and scores) of the 2020 CFO, as well as overall ranks from all previous CFO, regional, and Games™ competitions in which they competed, were recorded from their publicly available online profile. The highest, lowest, average, and standard deviation (SD) of past rankings, as well as participation statistics (i.e., years since first appearance, total and consecutive appearances, and participation rate), were calculated for each competition stage. Relationships were then assessed between 2020 CFO performance and all past competition experience variables by calculating Kendall's tau (τ) correlation coefficients and Bayes factors (BF10).

Results: Overall and weekly ranking of the 2020 CFO was extremely favored (p < 0.001, BF10 > 100) to be related to the athlete's highest previous CFO rank (τ = 0.26-0.39) and individual regional appearances (τ = - 0.26 to - 0.34), as well as individual Games™ appearances (overall and for weeks 1, 3, and 4; τ = - 0.20 to - 0.22, p < 0.001, BF10 > 100). Evidence for all other significant relationships ranged from moderate to very strong (p < 0.05, BF10 = 3-100) and varied among specific 2020 CFO workouts. Few associations were noted for team competition experience, and these were generally limited to Games™ appearances (τ = - 0.12 to - 0.18, p < 0.05, BF10 = 3.3-100).

Conclusions: Although specific relationships were found between 2020 CFO performance and individual appearances at regional and Games™ competitions, the most consistent relationships were seen with participation and ranking in past CFO competitions.

Keywords: Athlete; Games; HIFT; High-intensity functional training; Team.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationships (± 95% CI) between competition experience and 2020 CFO Overall rank. *Significant (p < 0.05) relationship between ranks
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationships (± 95% CI) between past CFO experiences and 2020 CFO workout ranks. *Significant (p < 0.05) relationship between ranks
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationships (± 95% CI) between 2020 CFO workout ranks and past experiences as A an individual and B team regional athlete. *Significant (p < 0.05) relationship between ranks
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationships (± 95% CI) between 2020 CFO workout ranks and past experiences as A an individual and B team regional athlete. *Significant (p < 0.05) relationship between ranks
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relationships (± 95% CI) between 2020 CFO workout ranks and past experiences as A an individual and B team Games™ athlete. *Significant (p < 0.05) relationship between ranks
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relationships (± 95% CI) between 2020 CFO workout ranks and past experiences as A an individual and B team Games™ athlete. *Significant (p < 0.05) relationship between ranks

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sheppard JM, Triplett NT. Program design for resistance training. In: Haff GG, Triplett NT, editors. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 4th ed: Human Kinetics; 2015. p. 439–69.
    1. McGuigan MR. Principles of test selection and administration. In: Haff GG, Triplett NT, editors. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 4th ed: Human Kinetics; 2015. p. 249–58.
    1. Pitts JD, Evans B. Drafting for success: how good are NFL teams at identifying future productivity at offensive-skill positions in the draft? Am Econ. 2019;64(1):102–122.
    1. Bradbury JC. Peak athletic performance and ageing: evidence from baseball. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(6):599–610. - PubMed
    1. Glassman G. CrossFit training guide level 1. CrossFit J; 2011.

LinkOut - more resources