CrossFit® open performance is affected by the nature of past competition experiences
- PMID: 35331301
- PMCID: PMC8944014
- DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00434-0
CrossFit® open performance is affected by the nature of past competition experiences
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the relationships between past competition performances and 2020 CrossFit® Open (CFO) performance.
Methods: A random selection from the top one thousand athletes (n = 220, 28.5 ± 4.4 years, 178 ± 7 cm, 87.5 ± 10.2 kg) were selected for this study. Overall and weekly performances (including ranks and scores) of the 2020 CFO, as well as overall ranks from all previous CFO, regional, and Games™ competitions in which they competed, were recorded from their publicly available online profile. The highest, lowest, average, and standard deviation (SD) of past rankings, as well as participation statistics (i.e., years since first appearance, total and consecutive appearances, and participation rate), were calculated for each competition stage. Relationships were then assessed between 2020 CFO performance and all past competition experience variables by calculating Kendall's tau (τ) correlation coefficients and Bayes factors (BF10).
Results: Overall and weekly ranking of the 2020 CFO was extremely favored (p < 0.001, BF10 > 100) to be related to the athlete's highest previous CFO rank (τ = 0.26-0.39) and individual regional appearances (τ = - 0.26 to - 0.34), as well as individual Games™ appearances (overall and for weeks 1, 3, and 4; τ = - 0.20 to - 0.22, p < 0.001, BF10 > 100). Evidence for all other significant relationships ranged from moderate to very strong (p < 0.05, BF10 = 3-100) and varied among specific 2020 CFO workouts. Few associations were noted for team competition experience, and these were generally limited to Games™ appearances (τ = - 0.12 to - 0.18, p < 0.05, BF10 = 3.3-100).
Conclusions: Although specific relationships were found between 2020 CFO performance and individual appearances at regional and Games™ competitions, the most consistent relationships were seen with participation and ranking in past CFO competitions.
Keywords: Athlete; Games; HIFT; High-intensity functional training; Team.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures






Similar articles
-
The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jan 19;6:1344036. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1344036. eCollection 2024. Front Sports Act Living. 2024. PMID: 38313217 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying CrossFit®: Potential solutions for monitoring multimodal workloads and identifying training targets.Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Oct 14;4:949429. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.949429. eCollection 2022. Front Sports Act Living. 2022. PMID: 36311217 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differential improvements between men and women in repeated CrossFit open workouts.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0283910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283910. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38015875 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance.Sports (Basel). 2020 Jul 20;8(7):102. doi: 10.3390/sports8070102. Sports (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32698335 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationships Between Internal and External Measures of Training Load and Intensity in Team Sports: A Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2018 Mar;48(3):641-658. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0830-z. Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29288436 Review.
Cited by
-
The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jan 19;6:1344036. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1344036. eCollection 2024. Front Sports Act Living. 2024. PMID: 38313217 Free PMC article.
-
CrossFit®: 'Unknowable' or Predictable?-A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit® Performance.Sports (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(6):112. doi: 10.3390/sports11060112. Sports (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37368562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantifying CrossFit®: Potential solutions for monitoring multimodal workloads and identifying training targets.Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Oct 14;4:949429. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.949429. eCollection 2022. Front Sports Act Living. 2022. PMID: 36311217 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Normative Scores for CrossFit® Open Workouts: 2011-2022.Sports (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;11(2):24. doi: 10.3390/sports11020024. Sports (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36828309 Free PMC article.
-
Acute effect of a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement on pacing and kinetic expression during shorter and longer bouts of high intensity functional training.J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2025 Dec;22(1):2529906. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2025.2529906. Epub 2025 Jul 8. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40627430 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Sheppard JM, Triplett NT. Program design for resistance training. In: Haff GG, Triplett NT, editors. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 4th ed: Human Kinetics; 2015. p. 439–69.
-
- McGuigan MR. Principles of test selection and administration. In: Haff GG, Triplett NT, editors. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 4th ed: Human Kinetics; 2015. p. 249–58.
-
- Pitts JD, Evans B. Drafting for success: how good are NFL teams at identifying future productivity at offensive-skill positions in the draft? Am Econ. 2019;64(1):102–122.
-
- Bradbury JC. Peak athletic performance and ageing: evidence from baseball. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(6):599–610. - PubMed
-
- Glassman G. CrossFit training guide level 1. CrossFit J; 2011.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous