Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr:48:202-209.
doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

The modified NUTRIC score (mNUTRIC) is associated with increased 28-day mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: Internal validation of a prediction model

Affiliations

The modified NUTRIC score (mNUTRIC) is associated with increased 28-day mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: Internal validation of a prediction model

Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni et al. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background: High prevalence of malnutrition was found in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score is frequently used for nutritional risk assessment in intensive care unit (ICU) COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of mNUTRIC score to predict 28-day mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU.

Methods: A cohort of consecutive COVID-19 critically ill patients admitted to ICU was retrospectively evaluated and the nutritional risk was assessed with the use of mNUTRIC score. A multivariable Cox regression model to predict 28-day mortality was therefore developed including the mNUTRIC as a covariate. Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap resampling technique to reduce possible bias in the estimated risks. The performance of the prediction model was assessed via calibration and discrimination.

Results: A total of 98 critically ill COVID-19 patients with a median age of 66 years (56-73 IQR), 81 (82.7%) males were included in this study. A high nutritional risk (mNUTRIC ≥5 points) was observed in 41.8% of our critically ill COVID-19 patients while a low nutritional risk (mNUTRIC <5 points) was observed in 58.2%. Forty-five patients (45.9%) died within 28 days after ICU admission. In multivariable model after internal validation, mNUTRIC ≥5 (optimism adjusted HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.08-5.25, p = 0.02) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein values (CRP) (optimism adjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.005) were independent predictors of 28-day mortality.

Conclusions: A high prevalence of malnutrition as revealed by mNUTRIC was found in our critically ill COVID-19 patients once admitted in ICU. After adjustment for covariables, mNUTRIC ≥5 and CRP levels were independently associated with 28-day mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The final model revealed good discrimination and calibration. Nutritional risk assessment is essential for the management of critically ill COVID-19 patients as well as for outcome prediction.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Intensive care unit; Modified NUTRIC score (mNUTRIC); Mortality; Nutritional risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors certify that they have no affiliation with, or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter discussed in this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Survival probability in critically ill COVID-19 patients with high and low nutritional risk. Patients with high nutritional risk (mNUTRIC score ≥5 points) showed a higher 28-day mortality than those with low nutritional risk (mNUTRIC score <5 points), log-rank p < 0.0001.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bootstrap estimate of calibration accuracy for 28-day mortality estimates from the final Cox model, using adaptive linear spline hazard regression. The line nearer the ideal line corresponds to apparent predictive accuracy. The blue curve corresponds to bootstrap-corrected estimates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blumenthal D., Fowler E.J., Abrams M., Collins S.R. Covid-19 - implications for the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1483–1488. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2021088. Epub 2020 Jul 22. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 23;: PMID: 32706956. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng Z., Peng F., Xu B., Zhao J., Liu H., Peng J., et al. Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020;81(2):16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alberda C., Gramlich L., Jones N., Jeejeebhoy K., Day A.G., Dhaliwal R., et al. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Oct;35(10):1728–1737. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1567-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li T., Zhang Y., Gong C., Wang J., Liu B., Shi L., et al. Prevalence of malnutrition and analysis of related factors in elderly patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Eur J Clin Nutr Nature Publishing Group. 2020;74:871–875. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barazzoni R., Bischoff S.C., Breda J., Wickramasinghe K., Krznaric Z., Nitzan D., et al. ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:1631–1638. - PMC - PubMed