Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;7(3):e007151.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007151.

Country-specific estimates of unintended pregnancy and abortion incidence: a global comparative analysis of levels in 2015-2019

Affiliations

Country-specific estimates of unintended pregnancy and abortion incidence: a global comparative analysis of levels in 2015-2019

Jonathan Marc Bearak et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Internationally comparable estimates of unintended pregnancy and abortion incidence can illuminate disparities in sexual and reproductive health and autonomy. Country-specific estimates are essential to enable international comparison, and to inform country-level policy and programming.

Methods: We developed a Bayesian model which jointly estimated unintended pregnancy and abortion rates using information on contraceptive needs and use, contraceptive method mix, birth rates, the proportions of births from unintended pregnancies and abortion incidence data. Main outcomes were the estimated rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion for 150 countries and territories, reported for the 5-year period 2015-2019, as annual averages per 1000 women aged 15-49 years.

Results: Estimated unintended pregnancy rates ranged from 11 (80% uncertainty interval: 9 to 13) in Montenegro to 145 (131 to 159) in Uganda per 1000 women aged 15-49 years. Between-country heterogeneity was substantial in all Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) regions, but was greatest in sub-Saharan Africa. Estimated abortion rates ranged from 5 (5 to 6) in Singapore to 80 (55 to 113) in Georgia. Variation between country estimates was similar in all SDG regions except for Europe and Northern America, where estimated abortion rates were generally lower.

Conclusion: The estimates reflect variation in the degree to unintended pregnancy and abortion that are experienced in countries throughout the world. This evidence highlights the importance of investing in access to contraception and comprehensive abortion care, including in regions which may have lower rates of unintended pregnancy or abortion, respectively, as countries may differ substantially from regional averages.

Keywords: public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process model (adapted from the study protocol21).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model-estimated unintended pregnancy rates sorted within Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) regions, annually per 1000 women aged 15–49 years in 2015–2019. Thicker and thinner lines are 80% and 95% uncertainty intervals. Northern America is an SDG region and contrasts with North America, with Mexico in Latin America and the Caribbean. Countries shown in grey were not grouped by the World Bank. *Regional averages were computed from 195 countries and territories; countries in Western Asia and North Africa are shown only if clustered with Eastern Europe.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Model-estimated unintended abortion rates sorted within Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) regions, annually per 1000 women aged 15–49 years in 2015–2019. Thicker and thinner lines are 80% and 95% uncertainty intervals. Northern America is an SDG region and contrasts with North America, with Mexico in Latin America and the Caribbean. Countries shown in grey were not grouped by the World Bank. *Regional averages were computed from 195 countries and territories; countries in Western Asia and North Africa are shown only if clustered with Eastern Europe.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kantorová V. Unintended pregnancy and abortion: what does it tell us about reproductive health and autonomy? Lancet Glob Health 2020;8:e1106–7. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30342-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henshaw SK, Singh S, Haas T. The incidence of abortion worldwide. Int Fam Plann Persp 1999;25:S30–8. 10.2307/2991869 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, et al. . Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007;370:1338–45. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61575-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plann 2010;41:241–50. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Shah IH, et al. . Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet 2012;379:625–32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types