Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;36(5):1371-1376.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01531-2. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

Affiliations

LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

Maria-Victoria Mateos et al. Leukemia. 2022 May.

Abstract

Despite treatment advances, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often progress through standard drug classes including proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). LocoMMotion (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04035226) is the first prospective study of real-life standard of care (SOC) in triple-class exposed (received at least a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 mAb) patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Patients (N = 248; ECOG performance status of 0-1, ≥3 prior lines of therapy or double refractory to a PI and IMiD) were treated with median 4.0 (range, 1-20) cycles of SOC therapy. Overall response rate was 29.8% (95% CI: 24.2-36.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 4.6 (95% CI: 3.9-5.6) and 12.4 months (95% CI: 10.3-NE). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 83.5% of patients (52.8% grade 3/4). Altogether, 107 deaths occurred, due to progressive disease (n = 74), TEAEs (n = 19), and other reasons (n = 14). The 92 varied regimens utilized demonstrate a lack of clear SOC for heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed patients with RRMM in real-world practice and result in poor outcomes. This supports a need for new treatments with novel mechanisms of action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M-VM: honoraria/member on the board of directors/advisory committees (Amgen, Adaptive Biotechnologies, BMS Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Sea-Gen, Takeda). KW: honoraria (Roche); consultant/honoraria (Adaptive Biotech, Karyopharm, Takeda); honoraria/membership on board of directors/advisory committees (BMS, Celgene, Amgen, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi). VDS: honoraria (Abbvie, Alexion, Amgen, AOP Pharmaceutical, BMS Celgene, Grifols, GSK, Sanofi, SOBI, Takeda); honoraria/research funding (Novartis). HG: honoraria (GSK); consultant (Adaptive Biotech); research funding (Incyte, Johns Hopkins University, Molecular Partners, MSD, Mundipharma); honoraria/research funding (Novartis); honoraria/research funding (Chugai); consultant/ honoraria/research funding (Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi). MD: honoraria/research funding (Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi). MM: honoraria (Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Gilead, Takeda, Novartis, Pfizer, Adaptive Biotech); honoraria/research funding (Celgene, Sanofi). MC: honoraria (Novartis); honoraria/consultant (GSK, Adaptive Biotech); honoraria/consultant, membership on board of directors/advisory committees/speakers bureau (BMS, Sanofi, AbbVie, Amgen, Takeda); honoraria/consultant/member of board of directors/advisory and speakers bureaus/travel accommodations and expenses (Janssen, Celgene). DD: employee/consultant/ honoraria/member of board of directors/advisory committees (Janssen Cilag); member of board of directors/advisory committees/research funding (Celgene). AuP: honoraria (AbbVie, Amgen, BMS Celgene, GSK); honoraria/research funding (Sanofi); honoraria/member of board of directors/advisory committees (Janssen); honoraria/research funding/member of board of directors/advisory committees (Takeda). RB: honoraria/research funding (Allogene, Janssen, BMS, Gilead, Servier). NWCJvdD: research funding (Cellectis), consultant (Takeda, Roche, Novartis, Bayer, Servier); research funding/consultant (Janssen, Amgen); consultant/honoraria (BMS Celgene). EMO: consultant (Sanofi, Oncopeptides); consultant/honoraria (Janssen, Takeda); consultant/honoraria/research funding (Amgen, BMS Celgene). ChS: honoraria (AbbVie); consultant (Roche); honoraria/member of board of directors/advisory committees (Novartis, Takeda); consultant/honoraria/member of board of directors/advisory committees (Amgen, BMS, Janssen). FG: honoraria (BMS); consultant/honoraria (Sanofi); member of board of directors/advisory committees (Roche, Adaptive Biotech, Oncopeptides, Bluebird Bio); honoraria/member of board of directors/advisory committees (Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, AbbVie, GSK). PR-O: honoraria/speaker bureaus (BMS Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, Oncopeptides). AB: honoraria (Amgen, BMS Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi). AnP, JMS: employees and holders of stock options at Janssen. CaS, MS, RW: employees of Janssen. SK: employee of Janssen R&D. VS: employee of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV. MV: employee of Janssen Global Services, LLC. TN: employee of Legend Biotech USA. JS-M: consultant/member of board of directors/advisory committees (AbbVie, Amgen, BMS Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Secura Bio, Takeda). PS: honoraria/research funding (SkylineDx); consultant/honoraria/research (Amgen, BMS Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm, Takeda). PM: honoraria (AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Sanofi, Celgene/BMS, Oncopeptides). RV, JL-H, EA, WR, and HE: no relationships to disclose. Funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC and Legend Biotech, Inc.; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04035226.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Study disposition.
aEnrolled patients are those who signed informed consent and were formally enrolled into the study. bTreated patients are those who were enrolled in the study and received at least one standard of care treatment.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier plots for survival outcomes.
Progression-free survival and overall survival based on RRC assessment in all patients (A, B) and in patients who achieved VGPR or better versus those who did not (C, D). RRC Response Review Committee, SOC standard of care, VGPR very good partial response.

References

    1. Ravi P, Kumar SK, Cerhan JR, Maurer MJ, Dingli D, Ansell SM, et al. Defining cure in multiple myeloma: a comparative study of outcomes of young individuals with myeloma and curable hematologic malignancies. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:26. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0065-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franssen LE, Mutis T, Lokhorst HM, van de Donk N. Immunotherapy in myeloma: how far have we come? Ther Adv Hematol. 2019;10:2040620718822660. doi: 10.1177/2040620718822660. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandhi UH, Cornell RF, Lakshman A, Gahvari ZJ, McGehee E, Jagosky MH, et al. Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy. Leukemia. 2019;33:2266–75. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0435-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durie BG, Miguel JF, Blade J, Rajkumar SV. Clarification of the definition of complete response in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2015;29:2416–7. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.290. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e328–e46. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data