Efficacy and safety of a reduced dose of plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy haploidentical stem cell donors
- PMID: 35332550
- DOI: 10.1111/vox.13266
Efficacy and safety of a reduced dose of plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy haploidentical stem cell donors
Abstract
Background and objectives: Implementation of the technique of immunomagnetic selection requires the procurement of a large number of CD34+ cells from haploidentical donors within a single apheresis procedure. The release of stem cells with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone is unsatisfactory in a number of donors, and plerixafor, a CXCR4 chemokine receptor antagonist, could be used as an additional mobilization agent. The aim of our study was to examine whether a lower dose of plerixafor (0.12 mg/kg) can provide sufficient increase in CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood of allogeneic healthy donors in comparison with a historical control group. In addition, we assessed the risk of inability to provide the recipient with a transplant containing the optimal dose of 8-10 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight of the recipient.
Materials and methods: In a prospective, single-arm study, we examined the results of 105 mobilizations in healthy adult haploidentical donors with G-CSF and plerixafor at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg. The historical control group consisted of 106 mobilizations with G-CSF and plerixafor at 0.24 mg/kg.
Results: The median increase in the number of CD34+ cells from day 4 to day 5 of mobilization was 69 cells/μl (range, 28-240) versus 77 cells/μl (24-217) in the groups of 0.12 and 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor, respectively (p-value 0.255). The apheresis products contained a median of 14.4 × 106 /kg recipient body weight CD34+ cells versus 12.9 × 106 /kg in the groups that received 0.12 and 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor, respectively (p-value 0.118). The obtained differences were not significant, which means the application of a decreased dose of plerixafor did not affect the results of mobilization.
Conclusion: The obtained differences in collection were not significant, and thus the application of a decreased dose of plerixafor did not affect the results of mobilization.
Keywords: allogeneic healthy donor; apheresis; plerixafor; stem cell mobilization.
© 2022 International Society of Blood Transfusion.
Similar articles
-
Plerixafor added to G-CSF allows mobilization of a sufficient number of hematopoietic progenitors without impacting the efficacy of TCR-alpha/beta depletion in pediatric haploidentical and genoidentical donors failing to mobilize with G-CSF alone.J Clin Apher. 2021 Aug;36(4):547-552. doi: 10.1002/jca.21891. Epub 2021 Mar 8. J Clin Apher. 2021. PMID: 33682959
-
Addition of plerixafor in poorly mobilized allogeneic stem cell donors.J Clin Apher. 2022 Aug;37(4):388-394. doi: 10.1002/jca.21992. Epub 2022 May 28. J Clin Apher. 2022. PMID: 35633513 Free PMC article.
-
PEGylated Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Plerixafor Enhance Autologous Stem and Progenitor Cell Mobilization and Transplantation in Pediatric Patients.Stem Cells Dev. 2025 Feb;34(3-4):61-72. doi: 10.1089/scd.2024.0178. Epub 2025 Jan 16. Stem Cells Dev. 2025. PMID: 39817857
-
Stem Cells mobilization and collection in allogeneic related and unrelated donors: a single center experience with focus on plerixafor.Transfus Apher Sci. 2023 Dec;62(6):103845. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103845. Epub 2023 Nov 3. Transfus Apher Sci. 2023. PMID: 37953206 Review.
-
EMA Recommendation for the Pediatric Indications of Plerixafor (Mozobil) to Enhance Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Collection and Subsequent Autologous Transplantation in Children with Lymphoma or Malignant Solid Tumors.Oncologist. 2020 Jun;25(6):e976-e981. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0898. Epub 2020 Mar 10. Oncologist. 2020. PMID: 32154610 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Laberko A, Sultanova E, Gutovskaya E, Shipitsina I, Shelikhova L, Kurnikova E, et al. Mismatched related vs matched unrelated donors in TCRαβ/CD19-depleted HSCT for primary immunodeficiencies. Blood. 2019;134:1755-63.
-
- Locatelli F, Vinti L, Palumbo G, Rossi F, Bertaina A, Mastronuzzi A, et al. Strategies to optimize the outcome of children given T-cell depleted HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2011;24:339-49.
-
- Maschan M, Shelikhova L, Ilushina M, Shekhovtsova Z, Khismatullina R, Kurnikova E, et al. Outcome of αβ T cell-depleted transplantation in children with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia, grafted in remission. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020;55:256-9.
-
- Martelli M, Reisner Y. Haploidentical ‘megadose’ CD34+ cell transplants for patients with acute leukemia. Leukemia. 2002;16:404-5.
-
- To L, Levesque J, Herbert K. How I treat patients who mobilize hematopoietic stem cells poorly. Blood. 2011;118:4530-40.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources