Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 25;11(3):e34201.
doi: 10.2196/34201.

Leveraging Large-Scale Electronic Health Records and Interpretable Machine Learning for Clinical Decision Making at the Emergency Department: Protocol for System Development and Validation

Affiliations

Leveraging Large-Scale Electronic Health Records and Interpretable Machine Learning for Clinical Decision Making at the Emergency Department: Protocol for System Development and Validation

Nan Liu et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: There is a growing demand globally for emergency department (ED) services. An increase in ED visits has resulted in overcrowding and longer waiting times. The triage process plays a crucial role in assessing and stratifying patients' risks and ensuring that the critically ill promptly receive appropriate priority and emergency treatment. A substantial amount of research has been conducted on the use of machine learning tools to construct triage and risk prediction models; however, the black box nature of these models has limited their clinical application and interpretation.

Objective: In this study, we plan to develop an innovative, dynamic, and interpretable System for Emergency Risk Triage (SERT) for risk stratification in the ED by leveraging large-scale electronic health records (EHRs) and machine learning.

Methods: To achieve this objective, we will conduct a retrospective, single-center study based on a large, longitudinal data set obtained from the EHRs of the largest tertiary hospital in Singapore. Study outcomes include adverse events experienced by patients, such as the need for an intensive care unit and inpatient death. With preidentified candidate variables drawn from expert opinions and relevant literature, we will apply an interpretable machine learning-based AutoScore to develop 3 SERT scores. These 3 scores can be used at different times in the ED, that is, on arrival, during ED stay, and at admission. Furthermore, we will compare our novel SERT scores with established clinical scores and previously described black box machine learning models as baselines. Receiver operating characteristic analysis will be conducted on the testing cohorts for performance evaluation.

Results: The study is currently being conducted. The extracted data indicate approximately 1.8 million ED visits by over 810,000 unique patients. Modelling results are expected to be published in 2022.

Conclusions: The SERT scoring system proposed in this study will be unique and innovative because of its dynamic nature and modelling transparency. If successfully validated, our proposed solution will establish a standard for data processing and modelling by taking advantage of large-scale EHRs and interpretable machine learning tools.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/34201.

Keywords: clinical decision making; electronic health records; emergency department; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: NL and MEHO are Scientific Advisors of TIIM Healthcare PTe Ltd, a startup with solutions in medical triaging. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study design. EHR: electronic health record.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of the data linkage process of raw data tables through 3 primary identifiers. BP: blood pressure; ID: identification; ICD: International Classification of Diseases; ED: emergency department; ICU: intensive care unit; HDU: high dependency unit; SpO2: peripheral oxygen saturation; FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen.

References

    1. Lowthian JA, Curtis AJ, Cameron PA, Stoelwinder JU, Cooke MW, McNeil JJ. Systematic review of trends in emergency department attendances: an Australian perspective. Emerg Med J. 2011 May;28(5):373–7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.099226.emj.2010.099226 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Derlet RW. Overcrowding in emergency departments: increased demand and decreased capacity. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Apr;39(4):430–2. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.122707.S0196064402290770 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Derlet RW, Richards JR. Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;35(1):63–8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70105-3.S0196064400097729 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoot Nathan R, Aronsky Dominik. Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;52(2):126–36. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.014. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18433933 S0196-0644(08)00606-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Di Somma S, Paladino L, Vaughan L, Lalle I, Magrini L, Magnanti M. Overcrowding in emergency department: an international issue. Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;10(2):171–5. doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1154-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources