Tail posture and motion in relation to natural behaviour in juvenile and adult pigs
- PMID: 35334394
- DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100489
Tail posture and motion in relation to natural behaviour in juvenile and adult pigs
Abstract
The tail of pigs has been suggested as a welfare indicator as it can provide insight into a pig's behavioural and emotional states. Tail posture and motion have so far mainly been studied in the context of tail biting behaviour. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between pigs' natural behaviour and their tail posture and tail motion. This was studied in a free-range farm in which tail biting is absent. In total 214 pigs of different age categories were observed individually (sows, gilts, boars, and 6-month old pigs) or by group (6-month and 1-year old pigs) for their tail posture, tail motion and behaviour, using live observations and videos obtained by drone. Results showed that a fully curled tail occurred most during locomotion (P < 0.001); and an actively hanging tail occurred more during foraging (P < 0.001), excavation (P = 0.006), feeding (P = 0.017), receipt of agonistic behaviour (P = 0.036), and non-agonistic social interactions (P = 0.046). A fully curled tail (P < 0.001) and a half curled tail (P < 0.005) occurred least in the group of sows. Tail motion was infrequent (6.7% of observations), and involved mainly loosely wagging, which occurred more during locomotion (P = 0.006) and non-agonistic social interactions (P = 0.006). A higher temperature-humidity index increased the probability of half curled tails (P < 0.001) and loose wagging (P < 0.001), while reducing the probability of active (P < 0.001) and passive hanging tails (P = 0.013). These results provide insight into tail posture and tail motion in pigs under semi-natural conditions, showing especially that hanging tails are not primarily associated with tail biting, and that the use of tail postures for welfare assessment should be in consideration with the context in which the animals are kept.
Keywords: Ethogram; Free-range; Pig behaviour; Tail; Tail movement.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The effect of docking length on the risk of tail biting, tail-directed behaviour, aggression and activity level of growing pigs kept under commercial conditions.Animal. 2018 Dec;12(12):2609-2618. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118000563. Epub 2018 Mar 25. Animal. 2018. PMID: 29573756
-
Tail and ear postures of growing pigs in two different housing conditions.Behav Processes. 2020 Jul;176:104138. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104138. Epub 2020 May 13. Behav Processes. 2020. PMID: 32413474
-
Tail biting in pigs.Vet J. 2001 Nov;162(3):196-210. doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0605. Vet J. 2001. PMID: 11681870 Review.
-
Can Tail and Ear Postures Be Suitable to Capture the Affective State of Growing Pigs?J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2021 Oct-Dec;24(4):411-423. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2020.1846535. Epub 2020 Nov 29. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2021. PMID: 33251879
-
Tail biting in pigs--causes and management intervention strategies to reduce the behavioural disorder. A review.Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2013 Mar-Apr;126(3-4):104-12. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 23540192 Review.
Cited by
-
Emotions spread like contagious diseases.Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 9;16:1493512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1493512. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40271352 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Instance segmentation and automated pig posture recognition for smart health management.J Anim Sci Technol. 2025 May;67(3):677-700. doi: 10.5187/jast.2024.e112. Epub 2025 May 31. J Anim Sci Technol. 2025. PMID: 40519624 Free PMC article.
-
Phenotypic link between protein efficiency and pig welfare suggests no apparent trade-offs for mitigating nitrogen pollution.Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 31;13(1):14299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41232-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37652949 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical