Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1144.
doi: 10.3390/nu14061144.

Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplements in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Infection: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials

Herim Cho  1 , Seung-Kwon Myung  2   3   4 , Hae-Eun Cho  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplements in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Infection: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials

Herim Cho et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent findings regarding the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of acute respiratory infections (ARIs). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of ARIs using a meta-analysis of RCTs.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles in June 2021. Two of the authors independently assessed the eligibility of the trials.

Results: Out of 390 articles retrieved from the databases, we included 18 RCTs, which involved 3648 participants, with 1838 in an intervention group and 1810 in a control group in the final analysis. In the meta-analysis of all the trials, vitamin D supplements had a beneficial effect in the treatment of ARIs (relative risk (RR) = 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.13; I2 = 66.9%). Publication bias was observed in the funnel plot. In the subgroup meta-analysis of high-quality RCTs, no significant efficacy of vitamin D supplements was found (RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98-1.06; I2 = 24.0%). Although statistically significant changes of 7% in the treatment effects were observed, they are not considered as clinically substantial ones.

Conclusions: The current meta-analysis suggests that vitamin D supplements are not clinically effective in the treatment of ARIs.

Keywords: acute respiratory infections; meta-analysis; randomized-controlled trial; vitamin D supplements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for identification of relevant clinical trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Efficacy of vitamin D supplements in treatment of acute respiratory infections in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (n = 18) [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s test for identifying publication bias. RR, relative risk; S.E., standard error.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Troeger C., Forouzanfar M., Rao P.C., Khalil I., Brown A., Swartz S., Fullman N., Mosser J., Thompson R.L., Reiner Jr R.C., et al. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory tract infections in 195 countries: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017;17:1133–1161. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30396-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simoes E.A.F., Cherian T., Chow J., Shahid-Salles S.A., Laxminarayan R., John T.J. Acute Respiratory Infections in Children. In: Jamison D.T., Breman J.G., Measham A.R., Alleyne G., Claeson M., Evans D.B., Jha P., Mills A., Musgrove P., editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2006.
    1. Dasaraju P.V., Liu C. Infections of the Respiratory System. In: Baron S., editor. Medical Microbiology. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; Galveston, TX, USA: 1996. - PubMed
    1. Thomas M., Bomar P.A. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2021. [(accessed on 1 December 2021)]. Upper Respiratory Tract Infection. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532961/ - PubMed
    1. Heikkinen T., Ruuskanen. O. Upper Respiratory Tract Infection. In: Laurent G.J., Shapiro S.D., editors. Encyclopedia of Respiratory Medicine. Academic Press; Oxford, UK: 2006. pp. 385–388.

Publication types

MeSH terms