Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 12;11(3):345.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens11030345.

Electrostatic Dust Cloth: A Useful Passive Sampling Method When Assessing Exposure to Fungi Demonstrated in Studies Developed in Portugal (2018-2021)

Carla Viegas  1   2   3 , Marta Dias  1   2   3 , Susana Viegas  1   2   3
Affiliations
Review

Electrostatic Dust Cloth: A Useful Passive Sampling Method When Assessing Exposure to Fungi Demonstrated in Studies Developed in Portugal (2018-2021)

Carla Viegas et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Electrostatic dust cloths (EDC) have been widely used for microbiologic contamination assessment in different indoor and occupational environments. This paper reviews sixteen studies performed in Portugal between 2018 and 2021 for evaluating the exposure to microbiological agents and focusing on fungi using EDC as a passive sampling method. The findings suggest that EDC can be applied as a screening method for particulate matter-exposure assessment and as a complementary method to characterize microbial exposures in occupational environments. Overall, EDC should be included, side by side with other sampling methods, in sampling campaigns focused on exposure assessments due to the advantages such as the straightforward extraction protocol favoring the employment of different assays, which allows us to assess exposure to a wide range of microbial agents, and presents higher accuracy regarding the fungal diversity.

Keywords: EDC; indoor environments; microbiological contamination; occupational exposure assessments; passive sampling method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mendell M.J., Adams R.I. The Challenge for Microbial Measurements in Buildings. Indoor Air. 2019;29:523–526. doi: 10.1111/ina.12550. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams R.I., Leppänen H., Karvonen A.M., Jacobs J., Borràs-Santos A., Valkonen M., Krop E., Haverinen-Shaughnessy U., Huttunen K., Zock J.-P., et al. Microbial Exposures in Moisture-Damaged Schools and Associations with Respiratory Symptoms in Students: A Multi-Country Environmental Exposure Study. Indoor Air. 2021;31:1952–1966. doi: 10.1111/ina.12865. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madsen A.M., Matthiesen C.B., Frederiksen M.W., Frederiksen M., Frankel M., Spilak M., Gunnarsen L., Timm M. Sampling, Extraction and Measurement of Bacteria, Endotoxin, Fungi and Inflammatory Potential of Settling Indoor Dust. J. Environ. Monit. 2012;14:3230–3239. doi: 10.1039/c2em30699a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shorter C., Täubel M., Pierse N., Douwes J., Howden-Chapman P., Hyvärinen A., Crane J. Objective Assessment of Domestic Mold Contamination Using Quantitative PCR. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016;137:622–624. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Cleef B.A.G.L., van Benthem B.H.B., Verkade E.J.M., van Rijen M., den Bergh M.F.Q.K., Schouls L.M., Duim B., Wagenaar J.A., Graveland H., Bos M.E.H., et al. Dynamics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Carriage in Pig Farmers: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014;20:O764–O771. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12582. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources