Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 28;14(3):541.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030541.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Simulation to Predict the Plasma Concentration Profile of Doxorubicin

Affiliations

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Simulation to Predict the Plasma Concentration Profile of Doxorubicin

George A Mystridis et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

Doxorubicin (DOX) is still an important anticancer agent despite its tricky pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity potential. The advent of systems pharmacology enables the construction of PK models able to predict the concentration profiles of drugs and shed light on the underlying mechanisms involved in PK and pharmacodynamics (PD). By utilizing existing published data and by analysing two clinical case studies we attempt to create physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for DOX using widely accepted methodologies. Based on two different approaches on three different key points we derived eight plausible models. The validation of the models provides evidence that is all performing as designed and opens the way for further exploitation by integrating metabolites and pharmacogenomic information.

Keywords: PBPK modelling; doxorubicin; pharmacokinetics; physiologically based pharmacokinetic model; simcyp simulator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicting interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Depiction of the three independent but interacting parts of a PBPK model. Adapted from Jamai et al. [21] which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attributions (CC BY 4.0) International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Mean, 95th percentile and 5th percentile of the concentration versus time of DOX for model 8 based on the works of Camaggi et al. DOX was given as a single IV bolus injection of 60 mg/m2 at 0 h. (B) Comparative mean concentration vs. time for all 8 DOX models.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Mean, 95th percentile and 5th percentile of the concentration versus time of DOX for model 8 based on the works of Speth et al. DOX was given as a 3-day IV bolus injection of 30 mg/m2 every 24 h. (B) Comparative mean concentration vs. time for all 8 DOX models for the above-mentioned administration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Mean, 95th percentile and 5th percentile of the concentration versus time of DOX for model 8 based on the works of Speth et al. DOX was given as a 3-day IV Infusion over 8 h of 30 mg/m2 every 24 h. (B) Comparative mean concentration vs. time for all 8 DOX models for the above-mentioned administration.

References

    1. Weiss R.B. The anthracyclines: Will we ever find a better doxorubicin? Semin. Oncol. 1992;19:670–686. - PubMed
    1. Carvalho C., Santos R., Cardoso S., Correia S., Oliveira P., Santos M., Moreira P. Doxorubicin: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Effect. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009;16:3267–3285. doi: 10.2174/092986709788803312. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chatterjee K., Zhang J., Honbo N., Karliner J.S. Doxorubicin Cardiomyopathy. Cardiology. 2010;115:155–162. doi: 10.1159/000265166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whirl-Carrillo M., Huddart R., Gong L., Sangkuhl K., Thorn C.F., Whaley R., Klein T.E. An Evidence-Based Framework for Evaluating Pharmacogenomics Knowledge for Personalized Medicine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021;110:563–572. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2350. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whirl-Carrillo M., McDonagh E.M., Hebert J.M., Gong L., Sangkuhl K., Thorn C.F., Altman R.B., Klein T.E. Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012;92:414–417. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.96. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources