The cognitive-phenomenological assessment of delusions and hallucinations at the early intervention in psychosis service stage: The results of a quality improvement project
- PMID: 35338593
- DOI: 10.1111/eip.13283
The cognitive-phenomenological assessment of delusions and hallucinations at the early intervention in psychosis service stage: The results of a quality improvement project
Abstract
Aim: Clinical assessments are vital for gaining an understanding of a patients' presenting problem. A priority for Early Intervention in Psychosis Service staff is understanding and supporting their patients' experiences of hallucinations and/or delusions. We aimed to identify what cognitive-phenomenology dimensions of hallucinations and delusions EIPS staff were assessing with their patients.
Methods: We developed a brief checklist of cognitive-phenomenological dimensions of hallucinations and delusions called the Lived Experience Symptom Survey (LESS) based on relevant literature. As part of a Quality Improvement Project, we reviewed the health records of a sub-sample of EIPS patients using the LESS identifying whether each dimension was present or absent.
Results: We found that all patients had been asked about the content of their hallucinations and/or delusions, and the majority had been asked about the valence of this content. Despite patients having experienced psychosis for almost 2 years on average, less than half of patients were asked about the potential or actual harm associated with these symptoms. All other cognitive-phenomenological dimensions were assessed inconsistently.
Conclusions: The assessment of hallucination and delusions in our EIPS was inconsistent and incomprehensive. These findings require replication in other EIPS' but may point to a need for guidelines and training around how to conduct a thorough assessment of hallucinations and delusions for current and future EIPS staff. Improved assessment of these symptoms will aid the development of risk assessments and treatment plans.
Keywords: delusions; hallucinations; psychiatry; psychotic disorders; quality improvement.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Addington, D., Birchwood, M., Jones, P., Killackey, E., McDaid, D., Melau, M., Mizuno, M., Mueser, K., & Nordentoft, M. (2018). Fidelity scales and performance measures to support implementation and quality assurance for first episode psychosis services. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 12(6), 1235-1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12684
-
- Addington, D., Cheng, C. C., French, P., Killackey, E., Melau, M., Meneghelli, A., Nordentoft, M., Nossel, I., Preti, A., & Smith, J. (2020). International application of standards for health care quality, access and evaluation of services for early intervention in psychotic disorders. Early Intervention in Psychiatry., 15, 723-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12990
-
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
-
- Clutton, P., Gadsby, S., & Klein, C. (2017). Taxonomising delusions: Content or aetiology? Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 22(6), 508-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2017.1404975
-
- Compton, M. T., Potts, A. A., Wan, C. R., & Ionescu, D. F. (2012). Which came first, delusions or hallucinations? An exploration of clinical differences among patients with first-episode psychosis based on patterns of emergence of positive symptoms. Psychiatry Research, 200(2-3), 702-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.041
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
