Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 24;50(3):277-281.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210519-00432.

[Mechanical circulatory support combined with immunomodulation treatment for patients with fulminant myocarditis: a single-center real-world study]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations

[Mechanical circulatory support combined with immunomodulation treatment for patients with fulminant myocarditis: a single-center real-world study]

[Article in Chinese]
Y C Jie et al. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relationship between the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) combined with immunomodulation and the prognosis of patients with fulminant myocarditis. Methods: This is a retrospective study. A total of 88 patients with fulminant myocarditis admitted to Dongguan Kanghua hospital from Aug. 2008 to Dec. 2020 were included. Medical histories, results of laboratory tests, treatment regimens and clinical outcomes of these patients during their hospitalization were collected from the medical record system. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into MCS+immunomodulation group (38 cases), MCS group (20 cases) and traditional treatment group (30 cases). Patients in the MCS+immunomodulation group received intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or IABP combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and immunoglobulin or glucocorticoid. Patients in the MCS group only received mechanical circulatory support. Patients in the traditional treatment group received neither mechanical circulatory support nor immunomodulatory therapy, and only used vasoactive drugs and cardiotonic drugs. The in-hospital mortality and length of stay were compared among the three groups. Results: A total of 88 patients with fulminant myocarditis aged (35.0±10.8) years were included, and there were 46 males (52.3%). The mortality of MCS+immunomodulation group (7.9% (3/38) vs. 56.7% (17/30), P=0.001 2) and MCS group (30.0% (6/20) vs. 56.7% (17/30), P=0.002 8) were lower than that of traditional treatment group. Compared with the MCS group, the in-hospital mortality in the MCS+immunomodulation group was lower (P=0.005 4). The most common cause of death was multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The constituent ratios of death in MCS+immunomodulation group, MCS group and traditional treatment group were 3/3, 4/6 and 12/17, respectively. The incidence of MODS in the MCS group (20% (4/20)) and the traditional treatment group (40% (12/30)) was significantly higher than that in the MCS+immunomodulation group (7.9% (3/38)) (both P<0.01). In discharged patients, the hospitalization time of MCS+immunomodulation group was shorter than that of traditional treatment group ((13.4±5.5)d vs. (18.5±7.4)d, P<0.05) and MCS group ((13.4±5.5)d vs. (16.9±8.5)d, P<0.05). Conclusion: MCS combined with immunomodulatory therapy is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and shorter hospital stay in patients with fulminant myocarditis.

目的: 探讨机械循环支持联合免疫调节治疗对暴发性心肌炎患者预后的影响。 方法: 本研究为回顾性研究,入选2008年8月至2020年12月东莞康华医院收治的暴发性心肌炎患者88例。收集纳入患者住院期间的病史资料、实验室检查结果、治疗方案、临床结局等资料。根据治疗方式将其分为机械循环支持+免疫调节组(38例)、机械循环支持组(20例)和传统治疗组(30例)。机械循环支持+免疫调节组采用机械循环支持[主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)或IABP+体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)]及免疫调节治疗(免疫球蛋白和糖皮质激素);机械循环支持组仅采用机械循环支持;传统治疗组未接受机械循环支持及免疫调节治疗,仅使用血管活性药和强心药等。比较3组患者的院内病死率及住院时间。 结果: 本研究共纳入88例暴发性心肌炎患者,年龄(35.0±10.8)岁,男性46例(52.3%)。机械循环支持+免疫调节组[7.9%(3/38)比56.7%(17/30),P=0.001 2]和机械循环支持组[30.0%(6/20)比56.7%(17/30),P=0.002 8]病死率均低于传统治疗组;机械循环支持+免疫调节组与机械循环支持组相比,院内病死率更低(P=0.005 4)。最常见的死亡原因为多脏器功能障碍综合征(MODS),其在机械循环支持+免疫调节组、机械循环支持组和传统治疗组中的死因构成比分别为3/3、4/6和12/17。MODS在机械循环支持组[20.0%(4/20)]和传统治疗组[40.0%(12/30)]的发生率明显高于机械循环支持+免疫调节组[7.9%(3/38)](P均<0.01)。在痊愈出院患者中,机械循环支持+免疫调节组患者的住院时间[(13.4±5.5)d]短于传统治疗组[(18.5±7.4)d,P<0.05]和机械循环支持组[(16.9±8.5)d,P<0.05]。 结论: 机械循环支持联合免疫调节治疗与暴发性心肌炎患者住院死亡率降低和住院时间缩短相关。.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • 2023 Chinese expert consensus on the impact of COVID-19 on the management of cardiovascular diseases.
    Bai F, Pu J, Che W, Chen J, Chen M, Chen W, Chen X, Chen Y, Cheng X, Cheng X, Cong H, Dai C, Fan D, Fu G, Gao L, Gao C, Gao W, Ge J, He B, Hu T, Huang C, Huang J, Huo Y, Jia S, Jiang J, Jing Z, Kong X, Li L, Li Y, Li Y, Li Z, Liang C, Lin X, Liu X, Liu X, Lu C, Ma G, Ma Y, Mao W, Mei X, Ning Z, Ou J, Slaj S, Shen C, Shi H, Shi H, Shi B, Su X, Sun N, Tang Q, Wang F, Wang C, Wang J, Wu Y, Wu Y, Xia Y, Xiang D, Xiao P, Xie P, Xiong D, Xu Y, Yang J, Yang L, Yu Z, Yuan Z, Yuan H, Zhang G, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhang L, Zhang R, Zhang S, Zhang S, Zhang Z, Zhao G, Zhao X, Zheng J, Zheng H, Zhou D, Zhou S, Zhou Y. Bai F, et al. Cardiol Plus. 2023 Apr-Jun;8(2):82-102. doi: 10.1097/CP9.0000000000000043. Epub 2023 Jul 20. Cardiol Plus. 2023. PMID: 37486153 Free PMC article.