Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Jun 28;346(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1007/BF01261768.

[Comparative study on single layer and two layer anastomoses of small intestine (author's transl)]

[Article in German]

[Comparative study on single layer and two layer anastomoses of small intestine (author's transl)]

[Article in German]
G Müller et al. Langenbecks Arch Chir. .

Abstract

The one layer anastomosis after Gambee is compared with the two layer anastomosis after Dick at the small bowel of 20 minipigs. The end-to-end anastomosis after Gambee consists of an interrupted, inverting suturing of the bowel wall. Dick suggested a closed method, applying bronchial clamps before resecting the bowel. Seromuscular sutures and inner all layer sutures are inserted interrupted. Experimental studies have been done after 4, 7, 14 and 21 days. In Histology two layer anastomoses caused delayed wound healing after 4 days. Twenty-one days after the operation histological findings in both groups were equal. Microangiographic studies showed, that in single layer anastomoses revascularization began 3 days earlier than in two layer anastomoses. Measuring of the bursting strength showed no significant differences. All parameters suggest equal value of both techniques. In our opinion the two layer anastomosis after Dick combines the advantages of a closed method with a simple, easy performable technique. We therfore apply it all over the gastrointestinal tract with exception of esophagel and rectal anastomoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1956 Aug;92(2):222-7 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1966 Aug;93(2):309-14 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964 Aug;119:269-75 - PubMed
    1. Helv Chir Acta. 1971 Apr;38(1):179-84 - PubMed
    1. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1974;335(4):309-20 - PubMed