Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 25;79(3):118-125.
doi: 10.4166/kjg.2022.011.

[Usefulness of Stool Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays in Patients with Acute Diarrhea]

[Article in Korean]
Seo Hyun Kim  1 , You Sun Kim  1 , Seung Hyuk Kim  1 , Won Eui Yoon  1 , Hee Jun Myung  1 , Jeong Seop Moon  1 , Dong Hee Whang  2
Affiliations

[Usefulness of Stool Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays in Patients with Acute Diarrhea]

[Article in Korean]
Seo Hyun Kim et al. Korean J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract
in English, Korean

Background/aims: There is a recent increase in the use of stool multiplex PCR assay-based diagnostic tests in patients with acute diarrhea. We used multiplex PCR assays to analyze the distribution of diarrhea-causing bacteria and viruses, as well as the clinical features of patients with acute diarrhea.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed stool specimens of inpatients complaining of acute diarrhea from October 2018 to July 2020. The stool specimens had been tested for bacteria and viruses using multiplex PCR assays.

Results: A total of 414 stool specimens from 346 patients were tested, and 152 pathogens were detected in 131 stool samples (131/414, 31.6%). Co-infection was detected in 20 patients (20/346, 5.8%). The common pathogens detected as causes of acute diarrhea, including co-infection, were Clostridium perfringens (34.9%), Clostridioides difficile (19.7%), and Campylobacter spp. (18.4%). The average age of patients with multiplex PCR-positive tests was lower than those with multiplex PCR-negative tests (p=0.001). In patients with suspected C. difficile infection (CDI), the RT-PCR for toxin gene assay was performed in 370 stool samples, 35 of which were positive (9.5%). Furthermore, 16 of the 35 samples were positive on the multiplex PCR assay (45.7%).

Conclusions: The multiplex PCR assay revealed that C. perfringens was the most common diarrhea-causing pathogen. In addition, in patients with suspected CDI, the multiplex PCR assay alone was insufficiently sensitive to detect pathogens and a conventional CDI test was additionally required.

Background/Aims: There is a recent increase in the use of stool multiplex PCR assay-based diagnostic tests in patients with acute diarrhea. We used multiplex PCR assays to analyze the distribution of diarrhea-causing bacteria and viruses, as well as the clinical features of patients with acute diarrhea.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed stool specimens of inpatients complaining of acute diarrhea from October 2018 to July 2020. The stool specimens had been tested for bacteria and viruses using multiplex PCR assays.

Results: A total of 414 stool specimens from 346 patients were tested, and 152 pathogens were detected in 131 stool samples (131/414, 31.6%). Co-infection was detected in 20 patients (20/346, 5.8%). The common pathogens detected as causes of acute diarrhea, including co-infection, were Clostridium perfringens (34.9%), Clostridioides difficile (19.7%), and Campylobacter spp. (18.4%). The average age of patients with multiplex PCR-positive tests was lower than those with multiplex PCR-negative tests (p=0.001). In patients with suspected C. difficile infection (CDI), the RT-PCR for toxin gene assay was performed in 370 stool samples, 35 of which were positive (9.5%). Furthermore, 16 of the 35 samples were positive on the multiplex PCR assay (45.7%).

Conclusions: The multiplex PCR assay revealed that C. perfringens was the most common diarrhea-causing pathogen. In addition, in patients with suspected CDI, the multiplex PCR assay alone was insufficiently sensitive to detect pathogens and a conventional CDI test was additionally required.

Keywords: Bacteria; Diarrhea; Multiplex polymerase chain reaction; Viruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of acute diarrheal patients who underwent stool multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015. [Internet] Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. [cited 2021 Jul 1]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/199350 .
    1. Shane AL, Mody RK, Crump JA, et al. 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:1963–1973. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix959. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DuPont HL. Acute infectious diarrhea in immunocompetent adults. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1532–1540. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1301069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guerrant RL, Van Gilder T, Steiner TS, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:331–351. doi: 10.1086/318514. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drancourt M. Multiplex testing of diarrhoea breaks down microbial barriers. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:663–664. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70844-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources